From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] edac: Add support for Amazon's Annapurna Labs L1
 EDAC
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 13:30:56 +0100
Message-ID: <20190709133056.00001c57@huawei.com>
References: <1562500658-14717-1-git-send-email-hhhawa@amazon.com>
        <1562500658-14717-3-git-send-email-hhhawa@amazon.com>
        <20190709173229.0000135f@huawei.com>
        <45e9ac35-9ffc-8f5f-cbdb-f85453227363@amazon.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <45e9ac35-9ffc-8f5f-cbdb-f85453227363@amazon.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Hawa, Hanna" <hhhawa@amazon.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, mchehab@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, paulmck@linux.ibm.com, dwmw@amazon.co.uk, benh@amazon.com, ronenk@amazon.com, talel@amazon.com, jonnyc@amazon.com, hanochu@amazon.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 14:01:03 +0300
"Hawa, Hanna" <hhhawa@amazon.com> wrote:

> On 7/9/2019 12:32 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa<hhhawa@amazon.com>  
> > A quick drive by review as I was feeling curious.
> > 
> > Just a couple of trivial queries and observation on the fact it
> > might be useful to add a few devm managed functions to cut down
> > on edac driver boilerplate.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> >> +#define ARM_CA57_CPUMERRSR_VALID		GENMASK(31, 31)  
> > For a single bit it's common to use BIT(31) rather than GENMASK to make
> > it explicit.  
> 
> Will fix.
> 
> > 
> >   
> >> +	edac_dev->mod_name = dev_name(dev);  
> > I'd admit I'm not that familiar with edac, but seems odd that a
> > module name field would have the dev_name.  
> 
> Will fix when I got more inputs.
> 
> >   
> >> +	edac_device_free_ctl_info(edac_dev);  
> > More a passing observation than a suggestion for this driver, but if there was
> > ever a place where it looked like a couple of devm_ allocation functions would
> > be useful, this is it;)
> > 
> > edac_dev = devm_device_alloc_ctrl_info(dev, ...)
> > ...
> > devm_edac_device_add_device(dev, ...)  
> 
> I agree.
> I can implement the devm_* functions in separate patches as this is not 
> related to my patches (and not to delay this patches).
> 

Great.

Jonathan

> > 
> >