devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@nxp.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/4] enetc: Clean up local mdio bus allocation
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:39:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190724163906.GT25635@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB4880CD977A5D58DA0A7EE56696C60@VI1PR04MB4880.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

> >All the horrible casts go away, the driver is structured like every
> >other driver, sparse is probably happy, etc.
> >
> 
> This looks more like a matter cosmetic preferences.  I mean, I didn't
> notice anything "horrible" in the code so far.

#define bus_to_enetc_regs(bus)  (struct enetc_mdio_regs __iomem *)((bus)->priv)

You should not need a cast here, bus->priv is a void *. But bus->priv
is being abused to hold a __iomem pointer.

enetc_wr_reg(&regs->mdio_cfg, mdio_cfg);

This is also rather odd, passing the address of something to an IO
operator? I also don't know the C standard well enough to know if it
is guaranteed that:

struct enetc_mdio_regs {
        u32     mdio_cfg;       /* MDIO configuration and status */
        u32     mdio_ctl;       /* MDIO control */
        u32     mdio_data;      /* MDIO data */
        u32     mdio_addr;      /* MDIO address */
};

actually works. On a 64bit system is the compiler allowed to put in
padding to keep the u32 64 bit aligned?

> I actually find it more
> ugly to define a new structure with only one element inside, like:
> struct enetc_mdio_priv {
>        struct enetc_hw *hw;
> }

One advantage of this is that struct enetc_hw correctly has all the
__iomem attributes. All the casts to __iomem go away, and sparse is
happy.

> Anyway, if others already did this in the kernel, what can I do?

Clean it up. Make the code more readable and easy to maintain.

      Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-24 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-24 14:41 [PATCH net-next v1 0/4] enetc: Add mdio bus driver for the PCIe MDIO endpoint Claudiu Manoil
2019-07-24 14:41 ` [PATCH net-next v1 1/4] enetc: Clean up local mdio bus allocation Claudiu Manoil
2019-07-24 15:18   ` Andrew Lunn
2019-07-24 16:03     ` Claudiu Manoil
2019-07-24 16:39       ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2019-07-24 14:41 ` [PATCH net-next v1 2/4] enetc: Add mdio bus driver for the PCIe MDIO endpoint Claudiu Manoil
2019-07-24 14:41 ` [PATCH net-next v1 3/4] dt-bindings: net: fsl: enetc: Add bindings for the central MDIO PCIe endpoint Claudiu Manoil
2019-07-24 14:41 ` [PATCH net-next v1 4/4] arm64: dts: fsl: ls1028a: Enable eth port1 on the ls1028a QDS board Claudiu Manoil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190724163906.GT25635@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=alexandru.marginean@nxp.com \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).