From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:00:07 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/7] pwm: rcar: remove a redundant condition in rcar_pwm_apply() Message-ID: <20190806160007.mqwzixddhzejbmcb@pengutronix.de> References: <1562576868-8124-1-git-send-email-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> <1562576868-8124-6-git-send-email-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Yoshihiro Shimoda , Linus Walleij , Geert Uytterhoeven , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux PWM List , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux-Renesas List-ID: Hello, On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:05:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:08 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda > wrote: > > Since the rcar_pwm_apply() has already check whehter state->enabled > > is not set or not, this patch removes a redundant condition. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > This is completely independent from the rest of the series, and can be applied > immediately, right? The original patch didn't make it into my mailbox. I only see a few replies. Is it only me? https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pwm/list/ doesn't seem to have it either. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K�nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |