From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/18] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:23:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20190814172301.9246520665@mail.kernel.org> References: <20190814055108.214253-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Brendan Higgins , Frank Rowand , Greg KH , Josh Poimboeuf , Kees Cook , Kieran Bingham , Luis Chamberlain , Masahiro Yamada , Peter Zijlstra , Rob Herring , Theodore Ts'o , shuah Cc: Petr Mladek , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Amir Goldstein , dri-devel , Sasha Levin , at-y27Ovi1pjclAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , linux-nvdimm , Kevin Hilman , Knut Omang , wfg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, Joel Stanley , David Rientjes , Jeff Dike , Dan Carpenter , devicetree , linux-kbuild , "Bird, Timothy" , linux-um-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Steven Rostedt , Julia Lawall , Bjorn Helgaas , kunit-dev-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.orgR List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-14 03:03:47) > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:52 PM Brendan Higgins > wrote: > > > > ## TL;DR > > > > This revision addresses comments from Stephen and Bjorn Helgaas. Most > > changes are pretty minor stuff that doesn't affect the API in anyway. > > One significant change, however, is that I added support for freeing > > kunit_resource managed resources before the test case is finished via > > kunit_resource_destroy(). Additionally, Bjorn pointed out that I broke > > KUnit on certain configurations (like the default one for x86, whoops). > > > > Based on Stephen's feedback on the previous change, I think we are > > pretty close. I am not expecting any significant changes from here on > > out. > > Stephen, it looks like you have just replied with "Reviewed-bys" on > all the remaining emails that you looked at. Is there anything else > that we are missing? Or is this ready for Shuah to apply? > I think it's good to go! Thanks for the persistence.