From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:58110 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725267AbfHQHFF (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Aug 2019 03:05:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 00:05:01 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Configure sgx interconnect data for some omap variants Message-ID: <20190817070501.GK52127@atomide.com> References: <20190814131408.57162-1-tony@atomide.com> <20190815040248.GF52127@atomide.com> <20190815041502.GG52127@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Adam Ford Cc: Linux-OMAP , =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson , devicetree , "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , Filip =?utf-8?Q?Matijevi=C4=87?= , Ivaylo Dimitrov , Merlijn Wajer , Michael Turquette , =?utf-8?B?UGF3ZcWC?= Chmiel , Philipp Rossak , Stephen Boyd , Tero Kristo , Tomi Valkeinen , linux-clk , moaz korena , "Andrew F. Davis" List-ID: * Adam Ford [190815 13:06]: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:15 PM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Looks like omap34xx OCP registers are not readable unlike on omap36xx. > > We use SGX revision register instead of the OCP revision register for > > 34xx and do not configure any SYSCONFIG register unlike for 36xx. > > Do you want/need me to test the OMAP3530? I can run the same tests I > did for the DM3730. Sure if you can dod that easily. Regards, Tony