From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8150b: Add pon and adc nodes Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 23:13:31 +0530 Message-ID: <20190819174331.GN12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink> References: <20190814125012.8700-1-vkoul@kernel.org> <20190814125012.8700-11-vkoul@kernel.org> <20190814170803.DEFCC214DA@mail.kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190814170803.DEFCC214DA@mail.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , sibis@codeaurora.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 14-08-19, 10:08, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-08-14 05:50:00) > > Add the pon and adc nodes found in pm8150b PMIC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) > > Squash? Ok > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi > > index c0a678b0f159..846197bd65cd 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > > // Copyright (c) 2017-2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. > > // Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited > > > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > > > @@ -11,6 +12,59 @@ > > reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>; > > #address-cells = <1>; > > #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + pon@800 { > > Maybe pon node name should be 'key' or 'power-on'? pon stands for power on device. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/qcom,pon.txt > > > + compatible = "qcom,pm8916-pon"; > > + reg = <0x0800>; > > + }; > > + > > + adc@3100 { > > + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc5"; > > + reg = <0x3100>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + #io-channel-cells = <1>; > > + interrupts = <0x2 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > > + > > + ref-gnd@0 { > > + reg = ; > > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > > + label = "ref_gnd"; > > + }; > > + > > + vref-1p25@1 { > > + reg = ; > > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > > + label = "vref_1p25"; > > + }; > > + > > + die-temp@6 { > > + reg = ; > > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > > + label = "die_temp"; > > + }; > > + > > + chg-temp@9 { > > + reg = ; > > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > > + label = "chg_temp"; > > + }; > > + > > + smb1390-therm@14 { > > + reg = ; > > + qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>; > > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > > + label = "smb1390_therm"; > > + }; > > + > > + smb1355-therm@78 { > > + reg = ; > > + qcom,ratiometric; > > + qcom,hw-settle-time = <200>; > > + qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>; > > + label = "smb1355_therm"; > > + }; > > Again, are these board level details? Maybe should be provided here with > status = "disabled" and then added by the boards that use these ADCs. Sure I will update these -- ~Vinod