From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Niklas Cassel Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/14] dt-bindings: cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: Support pstates provided by a power domain Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:27:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20190822102723.GB8494@centauri> References: <20190725104144.22924-7-niklas.cassel@linaro.org> <20190819100957.17095-1-niklas.cassel@linaro.org> <5d5ae389.1c69fb81.cb730.3225@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d5ae389.1c69fb81.cb730.3225@mx.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , Ilia Lin , Nishanth Menon , Viresh Kumar , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Rob Herring , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:59:36AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Niklas Cassel (2019-08-19 03:09:57) > > + > > +soc { > > +.... > > + cprpd: cpr@b018000 { > > Maybe node name should be 'avs' for the industry standard adaptive > voltage scaling acronym? I see where this is coming from, but "git grep avs" gives a single result. Also, since the label is cprpd, it doesn't make sense to simply rename the node name, and I don't think that avspd would be a good name, since it is less correct. So if you don't insist, I would prefer to leave it as it is. > > > > + compatible = "qcom,qcs404-cpr", "qcom,cpr"; > > + reg = <0x0b018000 0x1000>; > > + .... > > + vdd-apc-supply = <&pms405_s3>; > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>;