From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
To: dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
drinkcat@chromium.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
shengnan.wang@mediatek.com, louis.kuo@mediatek.com,
sj.huang@mediatek.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V1, 2/2] media: i2c: Add more sensor mode for ov8856 camera sensor
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 19:01:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190823100126.GB33937@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190808092215.5608-3-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
Hi Dongchun,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 05:22:15PM +0800, dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
>
> This patch mainly adds two more sensor modes for OV8856 image sensor.
> The OV8856 driver currently supports output format: 10-bit Raw,
> the resolution of 1632*1224 and 3264*2448, and the bayer order of BGGR.
> The hardware version also differs in some OTP regiser,
> as well as PLL register setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu <dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c | 624 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 621 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Thanks for the patch! Please see my comments inline.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> index cd347d6..e0610b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8856.c
> @@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> // Copyright (c) 2019 Intel Corporation.
>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/i2c.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-device.h>
> #include <media/v4l2-fwnode.h>
> @@ -19,6 +22,7 @@
> #define OV8856_LINK_FREQ_180MHZ 180000000ULL
> #define OV8856_SCLK 144000000ULL
> #define OV8856_MCLK 19200000
> +#define OV8856_XVCLK_FREQ 24000000
> #define OV8856_DATA_LANES 4
> #define OV8856_RGB_DEPTH 10
>
> @@ -29,6 +33,18 @@
> #define OV8856_MODE_STANDBY 0x00
> #define OV8856_MODE_STREAMING 0x01
>
> +/* define 1B module */
> +#define OV8856_1B_MODULE 0x02
> +
> +/* otp sram register */
> +#define OV8856_OTP_REG 0x700f
This isn't a register. I believe the OTP read-out buffer is at 0x7000 and
0xf is the offset of the byte in the OTP that means the module revision.
> +#define OV8856_OTP_REG_ONE 0x3d84
> +#define OV8856_OTP_REG_TWO 0x3d81
These registers are definitely not "ONE" and "TWO". Please use proper
names as per the datasheet.
> +
> +/* clock register */
> +#define OV8856_CLK_REG 0x3614
> +#define OV8856_CLK_REG_1B_VAL 0x20
Same here. These don't look like the real names of the register and bit
field.
> +
> /* vertical-timings from sensor */
> #define OV8856_REG_VTS 0x380e
> #define OV8856_VTS_MAX 0x7fff
> @@ -64,6 +80,14 @@
>
> #define to_ov8856(_sd) container_of(_sd, struct ov8856, sd)
>
> +static const char * const ov8856_supply_names[] = {
> + "dovdd", /* Digital I/O power */
> + "avdd", /* Analog power */
> + "dvdd", /* Digital core power */
> +};
> +
> +#define OV8856_NUM_SUPPLIES ARRAY_SIZE(ov8856_supply_names)
> +
> enum {
> OV8856_LINK_FREQ_720MBPS,
> OV8856_LINK_FREQ_360MBPS,
> @@ -316,6 +340,208 @@ static const struct ov8856_reg mode_3280x2464_regs[] = {
> {0x5e00, 0x00}
> };
>
> +static const struct ov8856_reg mode_3264x2448_regs[] = {
> + {0x0103, 0x01},
> + {0x0302, 0x3c},
> + {0x0303, 0x01},
> + {0x031e, 0x0c},
> + {0x3000, 0x00},
> + {0x300e, 0x00},
> + {0x3010, 0x00},
> + {0x3015, 0x84},
> + {0x3018, 0x72},
> + {0x3021, 0x23},
> + {0x3033, 0x24},
> + {0x3500, 0x00},
> + {0x3501, 0x9a},
> + {0x3502, 0x20},
> + {0x3503, 0x08},
> + {0x3505, 0x83},
> + {0x3508, 0x01},
> + {0x3509, 0x80},
> + {0x350c, 0x00},
> + {0x350d, 0x80},
> + {0x350e, 0x04},
> + {0x350f, 0x00},
> + {0x3510, 0x00},
> + {0x3511, 0x02},
> + {0x3512, 0x00},
> + {0x3600, 0x72},
> + {0x3601, 0x40},
> + {0x3602, 0x30},
> + {0x3610, 0xc5},
> + {0x3611, 0x58},
> + {0x3612, 0x5c},
> + {0x3613, 0xca},
> + {0x3614, 0x60},
> + {0x3628, 0xff},
> + {0x3629, 0xff},
> + {0x362a, 0xff},
> + {0x3633, 0x10},
> + {0x3634, 0x10},
> + {0x3635, 0x10},
> + {0x3636, 0x10},
> + {0x3663, 0x08},
> + {0x3669, 0x34},
> + {0x366d, 0x00},
> + {0x366e, 0x10},
> + {0x3706, 0x86},
> + {0x370b, 0x7e},
> + {0x3714, 0x23},
> + {0x3730, 0x12},
> + {0x3733, 0x10},
> + {0x3764, 0x00},
> + {0x3765, 0x00},
> + {0x3769, 0x62},
> + {0x376a, 0x2a},
> + {0x376b, 0x30},
> + {0x3780, 0x00},
> + {0x3781, 0x24},
> + {0x3782, 0x00},
> + {0x3783, 0x23},
> + {0x3798, 0x2f},
> + {0x37a1, 0x60},
> + {0x37a8, 0x6a},
> + {0x37ab, 0x3f},
> + {0x37c2, 0x04},
> + {0x37c3, 0xf1},
> + {0x37c9, 0x80},
> + {0x37cb, 0x16},
> + {0x37cc, 0x16},
> + {0x37cd, 0x16},
> + {0x37ce, 0x16},
> + {0x3800, 0x00},
> + {0x3801, 0x00},
> + {0x3802, 0x00},
> + {0x3803, 0x0c},
> + {0x3804, 0x0c},
> + {0x3805, 0xdf},
> + {0x3806, 0x09},
> + {0x3807, 0xa3},
> + {0x3808, 0x0c},
> + {0x3809, 0xc0},
> + {0x380a, 0x09},
> + {0x380b, 0x90},
> + {0x380c, 0x07},
> + {0x380d, 0x8c},
> + {0x380e, 0x09},
> + {0x380f, 0xb2},
> + {0x3810, 0x00},
> + {0x3811, 0x04},
> + {0x3812, 0x00},
> + {0x3813, 0x02},
> + {0x3814, 0x01},
> + {0x3815, 0x01},
> + {0x3816, 0x00},
> + {0x3817, 0x00},
> + {0x3818, 0x00},
> + {0x3819, 0x00},
> + {0x3820, 0x80},
> + {0x3821, 0x46},
> + {0x382a, 0x01},
> + {0x382b, 0x01},
> + {0x3830, 0x06},
> + {0x3836, 0x02},
> + {0x3862, 0x04},
> + {0x3863, 0x08},
> + {0x3cc0, 0x33},
> + {0x3d85, 0x17},
> + {0x3d8c, 0x73},
> + {0x3d8d, 0xde},
> + {0x4001, 0xe0},
> + {0x4003, 0x40},
> + {0x4008, 0x00},
> + {0x4009, 0x0b},
> + {0x400a, 0x00},
> + {0x400b, 0x84},
> + {0x400f, 0x80},
> + {0x4010, 0xf0},
> + {0x4011, 0xff},
> + {0x4012, 0x02},
> + {0x4013, 0x01},
> + {0x4014, 0x01},
> + {0x4015, 0x01},
> + {0x4042, 0x00},
> + {0x4043, 0x80},
> + {0x4044, 0x00},
> + {0x4045, 0x80},
> + {0x4046, 0x00},
> + {0x4047, 0x80},
> + {0x4048, 0x00},
> + {0x4049, 0x80},
> + {0x4041, 0x03},
> + {0x404c, 0x20},
> + {0x404d, 0x00},
> + {0x404e, 0x20},
> + {0x4203, 0x80},
> + {0x4307, 0x30},
> + {0x4317, 0x00},
> + {0x4502, 0x50},
> + {0x4503, 0x08},
> + {0x4601, 0x80},
> + {0x4800, 0x44},
> + {0x4816, 0x53},
> + {0x481b, 0x50},
> + {0x481f, 0x27},
> + {0x4823, 0x3c},
> + {0x482b, 0x00},
> + {0x4831, 0x66},
> + {0x4837, 0x16},
> + {0x483c, 0x0f},
> + {0x484b, 0x05},
> + {0x5000, 0x77},
> + {0x5001, 0x0a},
> + {0x5003, 0xc8},
> + {0x5004, 0x04},
> + {0x5006, 0x00},
> + {0x5007, 0x00},
> + {0x502e, 0x03},
> + {0x5030, 0x41},
> + {0x5780, 0x14},
> + {0x5781, 0x0f},
> + {0x5782, 0x44},
> + {0x5783, 0x02},
> + {0x5784, 0x01},
> + {0x5785, 0x01},
> + {0x5786, 0x00},
> + {0x5787, 0x04},
> + {0x5788, 0x02},
> + {0x5789, 0x0f},
> + {0x578a, 0xfd},
> + {0x578b, 0xf5},
> + {0x578c, 0xf5},
> + {0x578d, 0x03},
> + {0x578e, 0x08},
> + {0x578f, 0x0c},
> + {0x5790, 0x08},
> + {0x5791, 0x04},
> + {0x5792, 0x00},
> + {0x5793, 0x52},
> + {0x5794, 0xa3},
> + {0x5795, 0x02},
> + {0x5796, 0x20},
> + {0x5797, 0x20},
> + {0x5798, 0xd5},
> + {0x5799, 0xd5},
> + {0x579a, 0x00},
> + {0x579b, 0x50},
> + {0x579c, 0x00},
> + {0x579d, 0x2c},
> + {0x579e, 0x0c},
> + {0x579f, 0x40},
> + {0x57a0, 0x09},
> + {0x57a1, 0x40},
> + {0x59f8, 0x3d},
> + {0x5a08, 0x02},
> + {0x5b00, 0x02},
> + {0x5b01, 0x10},
> + {0x5b02, 0x03},
> + {0x5b03, 0xcf},
> + {0x5b05, 0x6c},
> + {0x5e00, 0x00},
> + {0x5e10, 0xfc}
> +};
> +
It would be better if we could find the differences between the two arrays
and handle them incrementally.
[snip]
> +static int ov8856_update_otp_reg(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = ov8856_write_reg(ov8856, OV8856_REG_MODE_SELECT,
> + OV8856_REG_VALUE_08BIT, OV8856_MODE_STREAMING);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = ov8856_write_reg(ov8856, OV8856_OTP_REG_ONE,
> + OV8856_REG_VALUE_08BIT, OV8856_MODE_STANDBY);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return ov8856_write_reg(ov8856, OV8856_OTP_REG_TWO,
> + OV8856_REG_VALUE_08BIT, OV8856_MODE_STREAMING);
Hmm, this doesn't sound right. The OTP register doesn't have anything to do
with streaming. Also we should stop streaming at the end.
> +}
> +
> static int ov8856_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> struct ov8856 *ov8856 = container_of(ctrl->handler,
> @@ -825,7 +1302,13 @@ static void ov8856_update_pad_format(const struct ov8856_mode *mode,
> {
> fmt->width = mode->width;
> fmt->height = mode->height;
> - fmt->code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10;
> +
> + /* Bayer Order is determined by image resolution */
> + if (fmt->width == 3264 || fmt->width == 1632)
Could we instead set the bayer order in the mode struct?
> + fmt->code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10;
> + else
> + fmt->code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10;
> +
> fmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> }
>
> @@ -850,6 +1333,17 @@ static int ov8856_start_streaming(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /* update R3614 for 1B module */
What's R3614?
> + if (ov8856->is_1B_module) {
> + ret = ov8856_write_reg(ov8856, OV8856_CLK_REG,
> + OV8856_REG_VALUE_08BIT,
> + OV8856_CLK_REG_1B_VAL);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to set R3614");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> ret = __v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(ov8856->sd.ctrl_handler);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -882,6 +1376,8 @@ static int ov8856_set_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable)
> if (ov8856->streaming == enable)
> return 0;
>
> + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "hardware version: (%d)\n", ov8856->is_1B_module);
> +
> mutex_lock(&ov8856->mutex);
> if (enable) {
> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->dev);
> @@ -908,6 +1404,54 @@ static int ov8856_set_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int enable)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* Calculate the delay in us by clock rate and clock cycles */
> +static inline u32 ov8856_cal_delay(u32 cycles)
> +{
> + return DIV_ROUND_UP(cycles, OV8856_XVCLK_FREQ / 1000 / 1000);
> +}
> +
> +static int __ov8856_power_on(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 delay_us;
> + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&ov8856->sd);
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(ov8856->xvclk);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to enable xvclk\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov8856->reset_gpio, 1);
According to my datasheet, this sensor doesn't have a reset pin. The one I
can see there is XSHUTDN, which I would call "n_shutdn" here.
> +
> + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(OV8856_NUM_SUPPLIES, ov8856->supplies);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to enable regulators\n");
> + goto disable_clk;
> + }
> +
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov8856->reset_gpio, 0);
According to the datasheet, XSHUTDN should be 0 for shutdown and 1 for
running. Why is it the other way around here?
> +
> + /* 8192 cycles prior to first SCCB transaction */
> + delay_us = ov8856_cal_delay(8192);
If we pass a constant to the function and the function itself only uses
constants inside, could we just define a constant delay instead?
> + usleep_range(delay_us * 2, delay_us * 4);
Normally one one just give some small delta here, like +/- 100 us.
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +disable_clk:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(ov8856->xvclk);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void __ov8856_power_off(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> +{
> + clk_disable_unprepare(ov8856->xvclk);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov8856->reset_gpio, 1);
> +
> + regulator_bulk_disable(OV8856_NUM_SUPPLIES, ov8856->supplies);
> +}
> +
> static int __maybe_unused ov8856_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> @@ -915,8 +1459,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused ov8856_suspend(struct device *dev)
> struct ov8856 *ov8856 = to_ov8856(sd);
>
> mutex_lock(&ov8856->mutex);
> - if (ov8856->streaming)
> - ov8856_stop_streaming(ov8856);
> +
> + __ov8856_power_off(ov8856);
This change is incorrect because it will power off even if the device was
already powered off, causing reference count mismatch. The original code
was okay.
>
> mutex_unlock(&ov8856->mutex);
>
> @@ -1089,6 +1633,20 @@ static int ov8856_identify_module(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> + /* set R3614 to distinguish harward versions */
hardware
> + ret = ov8856_update_otp_reg(ov8856);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to set otp register");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ov8856_read_reg(ov8856, OV8856_OTP_REG,
> + OV8856_REG_VALUE_08BIT, &val);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ov8856->is_1B_module = (val == OV8856_1B_MODULE) ? 1 : 0;
I'd rename ov8856_update_otp_reg() to ov8856_check_revision() and move the
few lines above to that function too.
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1164,11 +1722,27 @@ static int ov8856_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> media_entity_cleanup(&sd->entity);
> v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(sd->ctrl_handler);
> pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev))
> + __ov8856_power_off(ov8856);
> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
> mutex_destroy(&ov8856->mutex);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ov8856_configure_regulators(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&ov8856->sd);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < OV8856_NUM_SUPPLIES; i++)
> + ov8856->supplies[i].supply = ov8856_supply_names[i];
> +
> + return devm_regulator_bulk_get(&client->dev,
> + OV8856_NUM_SUPPLIES,
> + ov8856->supplies);
> +}
There is not much value in having a dedicated function just to call one
more function. Could you move back to the caller?
> +
> static int ov8856_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct ov8856 *ov8856;
> @@ -1186,6 +1760,40 @@ static int ov8856_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&ov8856->sd, client, &ov8856_subdev_ops);
> +
> + ov8856->xvclk = devm_clk_get(&client->dev, "xvclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(ov8856->xvclk)) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get xvclk\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(ov8856->xvclk, OV8856_XVCLK_FREQ);
We should get the frequency from the DT bindings.
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to set xvclk rate (24MHz)\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + if (clk_get_rate(ov8856->xvclk) != OV8856_XVCLK_FREQ)
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "xvclk mismatched, modes are based on 24MHz\n");
> +
> + ov8856->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&client->dev,
> + "reset",
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(ov8856->reset_gpio)) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get reset-gpios\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = ov8856_configure_regulators(ov8856);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get power regulators\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = __ov8856_power_on(ov8856);
> + if (ret)
> + goto probe_error_v4l2_ctrl_handler_free;
> +
> ret = ov8856_identify_module(ov8856);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to find sensor: %d", ret);
> @@ -1251,11 +1859,21 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id ov8856_acpi_ids[] = {
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ov8856_acpi_ids);
> #endif
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> +static const struct of_device_id ov8856_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ovti,ov8856" },
> + {},
> +};
> +
nit: Unnecessary blank line.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-23 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-08 9:22 [V1, 0/2] media: ov8856: DT bindings and sensor mode improvements dongchun.zhu
2019-08-08 9:22 ` [V1, 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Add bindings for ov8856 dongchun.zhu
2019-08-08 16:54 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-08-13 11:55 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-09-09 3:55 ` Dongchun Zhu
2019-08-08 9:22 ` [V1, 2/2] media: i2c: Add more sensor mode for ov8856 camera sensor dongchun.zhu
2019-08-08 13:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-09-09 8:46 ` Dongchun Zhu
2019-09-09 10:06 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-08-23 10:01 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2019-09-09 9:27 ` Dongchun Zhu
2019-09-10 13:23 ` Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190823100126.GB33937@chromium.org \
--to=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=louis.kuo@mediatek.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shengnan.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=sj.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).