From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Clarify interrupts-extended usage Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:57:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20190829225740.GA22740@bogus> References: <20190827025511.22166-1-swboyd@chromium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190827025511.22166-1-swboyd@chromium.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Frank Rowand , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Alexandru M Stan List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:55:11 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Reading the description about when to use interrupts-extended leads some > developers to think that it shouldn't be used unless a device has > interrupts from more than one interrupt controller. This isn't true. We > should encourage devicetree writers to use this property in situations > where it isn't the inherited interrupt-parent so that we have less > properties in a DT node by virtue of not having to specify an > interrupt-parent and an interrupts property. > > Reported-by: Alexandru M Stan > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > --- > .../bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Applied, thanks. Rob