From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] counter: new TI eQEP driver
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:16:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20190908121618.3e7e5618@archlinux>
References: <20190901225827.12301-1-david@lechnology.com>
 <20190905133721.GA728346@icarus>
 <20190905141053.GU52127@atomide.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190905141053.GU52127@atomide.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>, David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudA==?= Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:10:53 -0700
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:

> * William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com> [190905 13:38]:
> > On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 05:58:21PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:  
> > > This series adds device tree bindings and a new counter driver for the Texas
> > > Instruments Enhanced Quadrature Encoder Pulse (eQEP).
> > > 
> > > As mentioned in one of the commit messages, to start with, the driver only
> > > supports reading the current counter value and setting the min/max values.
> > > Other features can be added as the counter subsystem gains support for them.  
> ...
> 
> > I'm satisfied with this version of the patchset.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Jonathan, if you have no objections please pick up this up so that it
> > can make it to the 5.4 merge window coming in soon. Alternatively, I can
> > merge it into my repository instead and hold it for a while longer
> > there, if you prefer that route.  
> 
> Looks good to me too:
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Sorry, too close to the likely opening of the 5.4 merge window for it to
go via IIO this cycle (unless there is a significant delay for some reason!)
I'm happy to queue it up for 5.5 but before I do this, see replies to patch 1
about whether an immutable branch is needed as we are going across multiple
trees.

Thanks,

Jonathan