From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: Document the parent clocks
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:41:54 -0700
Message-ID: <20190909114155.32E40218AF@mail.kernel.org>
References: <20190826173120.2971-1-vkoul@kernel.org> <20190826173120.2971-2-vkoul@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190826173120.2971-2-vkoul@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-08-26 10:31:17)
> With clock parent data scheme we must specify the parent clocks for the
> rpmhcc nodes. So describe the parent clock for rpmhcc in the bindings.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---

Applied to clk-next