From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] tools lib traceevent: Convert remaining %p[fF] users to %p[sS] Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:26:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20190910142621.0bec208d@oasis.local.home> References: <20190910084707.18380-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190910084707.18380-2-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190910071837.2e9110f8@oasis.local.home> <61a2b2ab4693535850306f396aac2a328e1d5a21.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <61a2b2ab4693535850306f396aac2a328e1d5a21.camel@perches.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Sakari Ailus , Petr Mladek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Heikki Krogerus , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Tzvetomir Stoyanov , linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:18:44 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > > It's not just for the lastest kernel. We must maintain backward > > compatibility here too. If there use to be a usage of this, then we > > must keep it until the kernels are no longer used (perhaps 7 years?) > > That argues for not using "%pfw" at all for some number of years. > > Perhaps the '%pfw' should be '%pnfw' for 'name' and 'fwnode' -ENOCOMPREHENSION -- Steve