From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] iommu: pass cell_count = -1 to of_for_each_phandle with cells_name Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:37:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20190913073752.GA4520@8bytes.org> References: <20190824132846.8589-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20190903125210.GB11530@8bytes.org> <20190912074353.wqohpfydjxueqade@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190912074353.wqohpfydjxueqade@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Frank Rowand , Robin Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Matthias Brugger , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:43:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:52:10PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel > > Does this ack mean that Rob is expected to apply this together with > patch 2? "Expected" is a strong word. I'd more phrase it like I am fine with this patch going through his tree. Regards, Joerg