devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Cc: tinywrkb <tinywrkb@gmail.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6dl: SolidRun: add phy node with 100Mb/s max-speed
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 15:56:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190915135652.GC3427@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87muf6oyvr.fsf@tarshish>

> Tinywrkb confirmed to me in private communication that revert of
> 5502b218e001 fixes Ethernet for him on effected system.
> 
> He also referred me to an old Cubox-i spec that lists 10/100 Ethernet
> only for i.MX6 Solo/DualLite variants of Cubox-i. It turns out that
> there was a plan to use a different 10/100 PHY for Solo/DualLite
> SOMs. This plan never materialized. All SolidRun i.MX6 SOMs use the same
> AR8035 PHY that supports 1Gb.
> 
> Commit 5502b218e001 might be triggering a hardware issue on the affected
> Cubox-i. I could not reproduce the issue here with Cubox-i and a Dual
> SOM variant running v5.3-rc8. I have no Solo/DualLite variant handy at
> the moment.

Could somebody with an affected device show us the output of ethtool
with and without 5502b218e001. Does one show 1G has been negotiated,
and the other 100Mbps? If this is true, how does it get 100Mbps
without that patch? We are missing a piece of the puzzle.

	Andrew

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-15 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-10 15:55 [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx6dl: SolidRun: add phy node with 100Mb/s max-speed tinywrkb
2019-09-10 16:10 ` Fabio Estevam
2019-09-10 16:17 ` Baruch Siach
2019-09-10 16:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-10 18:50 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-09-15  6:30   ` Baruch Siach
2019-09-15 12:29     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-15 13:56     ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2019-09-15 14:06       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-15 14:15         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-15 14:42           ` Andrew Lunn
2019-09-15 14:58             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 12:41       ` tinywrkb
2019-09-17 12:54         ` Andrew Lunn
2019-09-17 13:32           ` tinywrkb
2019-09-17 13:39             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 15:17               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 15:30                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 16:34                   ` tinywrkb
2019-09-17 17:04                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 17:19                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 17:26                         ` Andrew Lunn
2019-09-17 17:37                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 18:19                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 18:39                               ` Andrew Lunn
2019-09-20 10:36                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 21:42                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-20 13:42                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 22:30             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-17 22:43               ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-09-18 14:45                 ` tinywrkb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190915135652.GC3427@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tinywrkb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).