RE: [EXT] Re: [v4 2/2] clk: ls1028a: Add clock driver for Display output interface

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>]

Quoting Wen He (2019-09-18 02:20:26)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> > Quoting Wen He (2019-08-29 03:59:19)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c b/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c new
> > > file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d3239bcf59de
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-plldig.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
[...]
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > > +/* Maximum of the divider */
> > > +#define MAX_RFDPHI1          63
> > > +
> > > +/* Best value of multiplication factor divider */
> > > +#define PLLDIG_DEFAULE_MULT         44
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Clock configuration relationship between the PHI1
> > > +frequency(fpll_phi) and
> > > + * the output frequency of the PLL is determined by the PLLDV,
> > > +according to
> > > + * the following equation:
> > > + * fpll_phi = (pll_ref * mfd) / div_rfdphi1  */ struct
> > > +plldig_phi1_param {
> > > +       unsigned long rate;
> > > +       unsigned int rfdphi1;
> > > +       unsigned int mfd;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +enum plldig_phi1_freq_range {
> > > +       PHI1_MIN        = 27000000U,
> > > +       PHI1_MAX        = 600000000U
> > > +};
> > 
> > Please just inline these values in the one place they're used.
> > 
> > > +
> > > +struct clk_plldig {
> > > +       struct clk_hw hw;
> > > +       void __iomem *regs;
> > > +       struct device *dev;
> > 
> > Please remove this, it is unused.
> 
> It is used for probe.

Use a local variable and don't store it away forever in the struct.

> > 
> > > +
> > > +       val = readl(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
> > > +       val = phi1_param.mfd;
> > > +       rfdphi1 = phi1_param.rfdphi1;
> > > +       val |= rfdphi1;
> > > +
> > > +       writel(val, data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLDV);
> > > +
> > > +       /* delay 200us make sure that old lock state is cleared */
> > > +       udelay(200);
> > > +
> > > +       /* Wait until PLL is locked or timeout (maximum 1000 usecs) */
> > > +       ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(data->regs + PLLDIG_REG_PLLSR,
> > cond,
> > > +                                       cond & PLLDIG_LOCK_MASK,
> > 0,
> > > +                                       USEC_PER_MSEC);
> > > +
> > > +       return ret;
> > 
> > Just return readl_poll_timeout_atomic(...) here.
> 
> Maybe use below code will to best describes.
> 
> If (ret)
>         return -ETIMEOUT;
> 
> return 0;

No, just return readl_poll_timeout_atomic().