From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 1/3] dt-bindings: misc: Add dt bindings for flex noc Performance Monitor Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:29:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20190926052959.GA1562021@kroah.com> References: <2de75a74ef4086090c532d3b80b7d6dcd115e45e.1569474867.git.shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2de75a74ef4086090c532d3b80b7d6dcd115e45e.1569474867.git.shubhrajyoti.datta@xilinx.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shubhrajyoti Datta Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, michal.simek@xilinx.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:46:24AM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: > Add dt bindings for flexnoc Performance Monitor. > The flexnoc counters for read and write response and requests are > supported. > > Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/misc/xlnx,flexnoc.txt | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/xlnx,flexnoc.txt Why are these "RFC"? I guess you don't want them merged because you are not thinking that they are good enough? What needs to be done on them that you are sending them out now? greg k-h