From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
To: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/3] media: ov5640: add PIXEL_RATE control
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:17:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003071714.zyldxfoollm26o4u@uno.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191002135134.12273-2-bparrot@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3218 bytes --]
Hi Benoit,
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:51:32AM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> Add v4l2 controls to report the pixel rates of each mode. This is
> needed by some CSI2 receiver in order to perform proper DPHY
> configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> index 500d9bbff10b..5198dc887400 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ struct ov5640_mode_info {
>
> struct ov5640_ctrls {
> struct v4l2_ctrl_handler handler;
> + struct {
> + struct v4l2_ctrl *pixel_rate;
> + };
Do you need to wrap this v4l2_ctrl in it's own unnamed struct? Other
controls here declared in this way are clustered and, if I'm not
mistaken, using unnamed struct to wrap them is just a typographically
nice way to convey that. I think your new control could be declared
without a wrapping struct { }.
> struct {
> struct v4l2_ctrl *auto_exp;
> struct v4l2_ctrl *exposure;
> @@ -2194,6 +2197,16 @@ static int ov5640_try_fmt_internal(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static u64 ov5640_calc_pixel_rate(struct ov5640_dev *sensor)
> +{
> + u64 rate;
> +
> + rate = sensor->current_mode->vtot * sensor->current_mode->htot;
> + rate *= ov5640_framerates[sensor->current_fr];
> +
> + return rate;
> +}
> +
Just to point out this is the -theoretical- pixel rate, and might be
quite different from the one calculated by the clock tree tuning
procedure (which should be updated to match Hugues' latest findings).
> static int ov5640_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> struct v4l2_subdev_format *format)
> @@ -2233,6 +2246,8 @@ static int ov5640_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> if (mbus_fmt->code != sensor->fmt.code)
> sensor->pending_fmt_change = true;
>
> + __v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl_int64(sensor->ctrls.pixel_rate,
> + ov5640_calc_pixel_rate(sensor));
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&sensor->lock);
> return ret;
> @@ -2657,6 +2672,13 @@ static int ov5640_init_controls(struct ov5640_dev *sensor)
> /* we can use our own mutex for the ctrl lock */
> hdl->lock = &sensor->lock;
>
> + /* Clock related controls */
> + ctrls->pixel_rate =
> + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops,
If you like it better, this could fit in 1 line
ctrls->pixel_rate = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops, V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE,
0, INT_MAX, 1,
ov5640_calc_pixel_rate(sensor)
Thanks
j
> + V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE, 0, INT_MAX, 1,
> + ov5640_calc_pixel_rate(sensor));
> + ctrls->pixel_rate->flags |= V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
> +
> /* Auto/manual white balance */
> ctrls->auto_wb = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(hdl, ops,
> V4L2_CID_AUTO_WHITE_BALANCE,
> @@ -2816,6 +2838,9 @@ static int ov5640_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> sensor->frame_interval = fi->interval;
> sensor->current_mode = mode;
> sensor->pending_mode_change = true;
> +
> + __v4l2_ctrl_s_ctrl_int64(sensor->ctrls.pixel_rate,
> + ov5640_calc_pixel_rate(sensor));
> }
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&sensor->lock);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-03 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 13:51 [Patch v2 0/3] media: ov5640: updates Benoit Parrot
2019-10-02 13:51 ` [Patch v2 1/3] media: ov5640: add PIXEL_RATE control Benoit Parrot
2019-10-03 7:17 ` Jacopo Mondi [this message]
2019-10-03 7:22 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-10-03 12:07 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-10-03 14:32 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-10-03 11:59 ` Benoit Parrot
2019-10-02 13:51 ` [Patch v2 2/3] media: ov5640: Fix 1920x1080 mode to remove extra enable/disable Benoit Parrot
2019-10-03 7:26 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-10-02 13:51 ` [Patch v2 3/3] media: ov5640: Make 2592x1944 mode only available at 15 fps Benoit Parrot
2019-10-03 7:31 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-10-03 12:09 ` Benoit Parrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191003071714.zyldxfoollm26o4u@uno.localdomain \
--to=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).