From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [v2 2/2] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Update the DT node definition for dpclk Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:21:52 +0800 Message-ID: <20191014062150.GC12262@dragon> References: <20190920083419.5092-1-wen.he_1@nxp.com> <20190920083419.5092-2-wen.he_1@nxp.com> <20191007123512.GM7150@dragon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wen He Cc: "linux-devel@linux.nxdi.nxp.com" , Leo Li , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 04:08:57AM +0000, Wen He wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Shawn Guo > > Sent: 2019年10月7日 20:35 > > To: Wen He > > Cc: linux-devel@linux.nxdi.nxp.com; Leo Li ; Rob Herring > > ; Mark Rutland ; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [v2 2/2] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Update the DT node definition > > for dpclk > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:34:19PM +0800, Wen He wrote: > > > Update DT node name clock-controller to clock-display, > > > > The node name clock-controller is so good, and I do not understand why you > > need to change it. > > > > The node name clock-controller used for the system clockgen and this clock only used for > the Display core. > To clearly the node, that why I have to use clock-display to instead of the clock-controller Label is being used to specify things, and node name should just be as generic as possible. Shawn