From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A09CA9EB9 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1220B7C for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389414AbfJVQav (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:30:51 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:39074 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387873AbfJVQav (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:30:51 -0400 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C281A80FA; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:30:48 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Benoit Parrot Cc: Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch 0/3] ARM: dts: dra7: add vpe nodes Message-ID: <20191022163048.GY5610@atomide.com> References: <20191009175628.20570-1-bparrot@ti.com> <20191022162720.yile7i4qwxgbuuou@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191022162720.yile7i4qwxgbuuou@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Benoit Parrot [191022 16:28]: > Tony, > > Ping, > > I already had comments from Rob but i would like your feedback before > sending a v2. Looks good to me in general other than what Rob commented on. Did not spot any node naming issues here :) Regards, Tony