From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67277C5DF62 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB16214D8 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:32:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572975137; bh=yDuxotFXs1FYNXnjjemxUjVnTa7mhmweVIbX2xUY4Po=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=SakPstEeZo4CDxdCJJzxHczW9iy2LCBMF9KeGEBXKzg/hz+h7ERTM99np+86ug661 v4Y+wf2ILwEOOoN0XS31paJehlHA+55M4fPlMUPJ5PPvpRp+Uhya6MbT/j5Ctdt9zF BeOed7qjI1+idVDFNpSbMl6csv+AMgUSwpnQHO1k= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390258AbfKERcO (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:32:14 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53816 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387776AbfKERcN (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Nov 2019 12:32:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (lfbn-1-10718-76.w90-89.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.89.68.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BD482087E; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:32:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572975132; bh=yDuxotFXs1FYNXnjjemxUjVnTa7mhmweVIbX2xUY4Po=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lH2+6849jtmlQEYhuHDm8T1wfQtFGbiPiMYzlJSBFroTT5+hom11G9nS1EGuMRwMB yKDuyuZNPw9UsMin8XJ6oo61kMPcr0DMDg+C7trMcMc7GECpzZSOJr82RoQpmLhV54 4Ohb/xjlD1HtNDGL0Iq9v8AIRXB5RMpepFdOqzsU= Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:32:08 +0100 From: Maxime Ripard To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_P=E9ron?= Cc: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , Jernej Skrabec , Pengutronix Kernel Team Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner: Add H6 PWM description Message-ID: <20191105173208.GA46143@gilmour.lan> References: <20191103203334.10539-1-peron.clem@gmail.com> <20191103203334.10539-2-peron.clem@gmail.com> <20191104080359.6kjugbt3yi63ywhb@pengutronix.de> <20191105111134.GG3876@gilmour.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 01:34:37PM +0100, Cl=E9ment P=E9ron wrote: > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 12:11, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > Hi Clement, Uwe, > > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 09:03:59AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 09:33:28PM +0100, Cl=E9ment P=E9ron wrote: > > > > From: Jernej Skrabec > > > > > > > > H6 PWM block is basically the same as A20 PWM, except that it also = has > > > > bus clock and reset line which needs to be handled accordingly. > > > > > > > > Expand Allwinner PWM binding with H6 PWM specifics. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec > > > > Signed-off-by: Cl=E9ment P=E9ron > > > > --- > > > > .../bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun4i-a10-pwm.yaml | 45 +++++++++++++++= +++- > > > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun4i-= a10-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun4i-a10-pw= m.yaml > > > > index 0ac52f83a58c..bf36ea509f31 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun4i-a10-pwm= =2Eyaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun4i-a10-pwm= =2Eyaml > > > > @@ -30,13 +30,46 @@ properties: > > > > - items: > > > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-h5-pwm > > > > - const: allwinner,sun5i-a13-pwm > > > > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-h6-pwm > > > > > > > > reg: > > > > maxItems: 1 > > > > > > > > - clocks: > > > > + # Even though it only applies to subschemas under the conditiona= ls, > > > > + # not listing them here will trigger a warning because of the > > > > + # additionalsProperties set to false. > > > > + clocks: true > > > > + clock-names: true > > > > + resets: > > > > maxItems: 1 > > > > > > > > + if: > > > > + properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > + contains: > > > > + const: allwinner,sun50i-h6-pwm > > > > + > > > > + then: > > > > + properties: > > > > + clocks: > > > > + items: > > > > + - description: Module Clock > > > > + - description: Bus Clock > > > > + > > > > + clock-names: > > > > + items: > > > > + - const: mod > > > > + - const: bus > > > > + > > > > + required: > > > > + - clock-names > > > > + - resets > > > > + > > > > + else: > > > > + properties: > > > > + clocks: > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > + > > > > > > I guess this hunk says "If this is a allwinner,sun50i-h6-pwm, a mod a= nd > > > bus clock is required.", right? > > > > > > I wonder if it is sensible to require a clock-names property in the e= lse > > > branch, too. This would make it obvious if the clock there corresponds > > > to the "mod" or the "bus" clock on H6. (I guess it's "mod".) > > > > This can be done a bit differently and could address your concerns > > > > Something like > > > > properties: > > ... > > > > clocks: > > minItems: 1 > > maxItems: 2 > > items: > > - description: Bus Clock > > - description: Module Clock > > > > required: > > - clocks > > > > if: > > ... > > > > then: > > properties: > > clocks: > > maxItems: 2 > > Here we should set minItems to 2 right ? > so Max =3D Min =3D 2 It's done automatically by the tooling when the other is missing. Maxime