devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: "Clément Péron" <peron.clem@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <pza@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock directly
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:58:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113085858.76rad3vpszknu4cp@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191108084517.21617-5-peron.clem@gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 09:45:14AM +0100, Clément Péron wrote:
> From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
> 
> PWM core has an option to bypass whole logic and output unchanged source
> clock as PWM output. This is achieved by enabling bypass bit.
> 
> Note that when bypass is enabled, no other setting has any meaning, not
> even enable bit.
> 
> This mode of operation is needed to achieve high enough frequency to
> serve as clock source for AC200 chip which is integrated into same
> package as H6 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index a10022d6c0fd..9cc928ab47bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
>   * Driver for Allwinner sun4i Pulse Width Modulation Controller
>   *
>   * Copyright (C) 2014 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> + *
> + * Limitations:
> + * - When outputing the source clock directly, the PWM logic will be bypassed
> + *   and the currently running period is not guaranteed to be completed
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> @@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ static const u32 prescaler_table[] = {
>  
>  struct sun4i_pwm_data {
>  	bool has_prescaler_bypass;
> +	bool has_direct_mod_clk_output;
>  	unsigned int npwm;
>  };
>  
> @@ -118,6 +123,20 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  
>  	val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * PWM chapter in H6 manual has a diagram which explains that if bypass
> +	 * bit is set, no other setting has any meaning. Even more, experiment
> +	 * proved that also enable bit is ignored in this case.
> +	 */
> +	if ((val & BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm)) &&
> +	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
> +		state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
> +		state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(state->period, 2);

I first thought you're losing precision here by reusing state->period
here, but with a divisor of 2 everything is fine.

> +		state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> +		state->enabled = true;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if ((PWM_REG_PRESCAL(val, pwm->hwpwm) == PWM_PRESCAL_MASK) &&
>  	    sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass)
>  		prescaler = 1;
> @@ -204,6 +223,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  	struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm = to_sun4i_pwm_chip(chip);
>  	struct pwm_state cstate;
>  	u32 ctrl;
> +	bool bypass = false;
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned int delay_us;
>  	unsigned long now;
> @@ -218,9 +238,24 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Although it would make much more sense to check for bypass in
> +	 * sun4i_pwm_calculate(), value of bypass bit also depends on "enabled".

I don't understand this reasoning. sun4i_pwm_calculate knows about
.enabled and also sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output. Maybe just
add a bool *bypass as parameter and move the logic there?

> +	 */
> +	if (state->enabled) {
> +		u32 clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
> +		bypass = (state->period * clk_rate >= NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
> +			 (state->period * clk_rate < 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
> +			 (state->duty_cycle * clk_rate * 2 >= NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +	}
> +

This looks right now.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-13  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-08  8:45 [PATCH v4 0/7] Add support for H6 PWM Clément Péron
2019-11-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner: Add H6 PWM description Clément Péron
2019-11-12 19:31   ` Rob Herring
2019-11-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] pwm: sun4i: Add an optional probe for reset line Clément Péron
2019-11-13  8:27   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] pwm: sun4i: Add an optional probe for bus clock Clément Péron
2019-11-13  8:35   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-14 22:36     ` Clément Péron
2019-11-15  7:25       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] pwm: sun4i: Add support to output source clock directly Clément Péron
2019-11-13  8:58   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2019-11-14 22:47     ` Clément Péron
2019-11-15  7:35       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] pwm: sun4i: Add support for H6 PWM Clément Péron
2019-11-13  9:00   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-11-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add PWM node Clément Péron
2019-11-08  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] [DO NOT MERGE] arm64: allwinner: h6: enable Beelink GS1 PWM Clément Péron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191113085858.76rad3vpszknu4cp@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=peron.clem@gmail.com \
    --cc=pza@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).