From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2EDC432C0 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0AD20706 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gerhold.net header.i=@gerhold.net header.b="IagYogM3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727788AbfKVOKa (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:10:30 -0500 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.163]:15519 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726100AbfKVOK3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:10:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1574431824; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=gerhold.net; h=In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=EJSl3iRJcanzg159K/qfpdsrnAGlP/ValPtgHthr2To=; b=IagYogM3d820iB2L+gXfiZBOm8r19xQ1Jcx0afMNzzl0DIa++kngCrB87VBp16nOY5 dWeOhJBA9P1f2SqTO6ETXRDcGypATfWf/t402Dt1+UR+E9GYSkS/c+m3nNJ9LclFwekd 9Q7H8bHdA0fS39BTMBquAboxvTY95D5DD4cTI828Uf7jUveVwDNDojur8jn510AeUoMe z1Gr3xH/sqtyMgS+1aEUYuQeENZxTdAd0XRQY09zL/Vf4ehW0hMjtE33Q94cf+i0BnZr 422LCMWG6rKVgZsEw6qTzR3OsdwpiuEC6/DPgzGzAuiubRGzxpNWsGW96D9vmH1XFnn+ XXVw== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P3gBZUipdd93FF5ZZvYFPugejmSTVR2nRPhVOQ/OcYgojyw4j34+u26zEodhPgRDZ8fxIc6p" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from gerhold.net by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.29.0 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id e07688vAMEAN4rh (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:10:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 15:10:09 +0100 From: Stephan Gerhold To: Linus Walleij Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Linux ARM , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] dt-bindings: arm: Document compatibles for Ux500 boards Message-ID: <20191122140944.GA2872@gerhold.net> References: <20191120181857.97174-1-stephan@gerhold.net> <20191120181857.97174-4-stephan@gerhold.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:22:19PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 7:20 PM Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > > The device-specific compatible values used by the Ux500 boards > > were not documented so far. Add a new simple schema to document them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold > > Nice, thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > I expect Rob to merge these patches as they are bindings-only, > alternatively I can take them in the Ux500 DTS pull request > for the next kernel cycle. > For this patch it would be easier if you take it through the Ux500 tree, as I have another patch series that adds a new board to it. The vendor-prefix patches are independent, so Rob can merge them if that is easier? Thanks, Stephan