From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CF6C35247 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC2B20702 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:48:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580921282; bh=npOYvnvrovIcxTpmP/BSyN24E8S0U9eg6c+lfbjDJCU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Cu9LLai7YZpwXp3m7X1FfqUTpklxuuPrImXGhGC/UrQT82qpsMk+sXK5GDxHqMgdU QZMye2A3DmgZ6h6LcNFAu2wybz4ewlg+gXFx0QoO1xmP5+ZWVdQIhJLbZtnPZPTZQ/ Bb+LXwUKNDR9NtaMVy+oQimKE3UOT2wA2+EUXDf4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727083AbgBEQsC (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:48:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:55634 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727081AbgBEQsC (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:48:02 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id q9so3224405wmj.5; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:48:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sg+9y4ZuDI4laj7uyhA1zY5m32IMeo2ETRsWzCEEVrk=; b=ByfUCqp8NWXvLJvN/PucWoNvvRNNAu1veqKLyPrUoJ4kYwvb3uwpUk53ECIsoC19J0 BUUk36nKl00iq5cfrtXlCoMYniEUqigN76jtgpBwaywkGkp+6mzFUspQP3V0C45gZIK6 Obc6b53L6xF51ONl38zjfiyRaCcupqT8Mw+1DhJDgnRfZAW9o1aAJNdkgqZmAuM5NeX2 xBaujovvRn1/FMvWHMk/sBZ6YEA4uXSks60orCDAv+KhkTdYwo7Fj6pDBySopVjt9X07 53V1w7kvq+zFyBtTgjNKrE3WEHmnsjpLi93q6ddtDwAY3/yXgRDTQXgSjp1qsdpxLzj5 paDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVVhCYi6Hptw75TMdObozbpdfjlHNJOx9wUrZJXdowrY466EB7t 8nrNrCvUQewl1U7wDovTFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMtUlQEaUDNrfzAKaMRiKiWvrZGJX2RF0Ip2aB9NqMpVgSSfmUtf5bgXleEXGsJ6mGhtAd2w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:545d:: with SMTP id p29mr7218951wmi.91.1580921280285; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:48:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rob-hp-laptop ([212.187.182.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a26sm203951wmm.18.2020.02.05.08.47.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 08:47:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 23017 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:47:58 -0000 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:47:58 +0000 From: Rob Herring To: James Tai Cc: linux-realtek-soc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: realtek: Document RTD1319 and Realtek PymParticle EVB Message-ID: <20200205164758.GA22823@bogus> References: <20200204145207.28622-1-james.tai@realtek.com> <20200204145207.28622-2-james.tai@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200204145207.28622-2-james.tai@realtek.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 22:52:06 +0800, James Tai wrote: > Define compatible strings for Realtek RTD1319 SoC and Realtek PymParticle > EVB. > > Signed-off-by: James Tai > --- > v2 -> v3: Unchanged > > v1 -> v2: > * Put string in alphabetical order > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/realtek.yaml | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.