From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A19C352A1 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 00:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD0322522 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 00:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="BPbxcNj6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727543AbgBIAT1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Feb 2020 19:19:27 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]:33052 "EHLO mail-pg1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727527AbgBIAT0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Feb 2020 19:19:26 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 6so1855452pgk.0 for ; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 16:19:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Sstt02xcY3tWivWVDeG5iBViBhgDcepwGoXIUUCRlj4=; b=BPbxcNj6SmiZxSbe75MPs5wgysL/4VNC8ywY9+pPcNVd5S2M8SRDxNwfWfTJyj150R WQNu4RB/bLoGYnZ1Nd3Qpa+8CuWSZ/wHtK7Cc+qKa/R9nhfZ0JQlCMUgiXW/yzDslyH1 qlJ7tJ99NjX78Y25d1bG98cJx0SsfoCyM6YYa9vTS3kbi/yJHYXhFSYRBKBIelZVy2Ke 0xt6+sGby2W7BOs6AHGa/bFBlKEeUqCFLP2K/rGjPont15exh5IYLTWMj7fmOThiUkOR vmq0E+9ag/9g55KPMYeaLVEVsKewAGhZwpFYWX8twWDStuo+6l0p2FiBwqNDAGV6tbCw UyQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Sstt02xcY3tWivWVDeG5iBViBhgDcepwGoXIUUCRlj4=; b=lLU3xt6GyX0Y0vIGRddL3UiUFS05aMGNoX8BG2hvSDgx6jBoiv7X3A7821iOemnFTu HdNkPl2xbHX+yB0QA2mmtVOvXIQFIXkcAnx4XbeZ7dHCdV6dNhuVj6NnNYGx4gLkI+Fb /RgvMJHiaUlRr4cwgIa6Lwljb9Ajpc75dnxNINIDAXfvcygWuDRk6l6U6oiG8gs3W7qc 4I5NJteybd+mt3ymTkv1ZSLCrpYZg0qLwul9pMocj04G3Ux0WzH7z/WYrR5BsvXYOdNH ++taxFleT8c/27agGkdGz7x2w60M7cOdCpz40J8pOZrqr/71Np23cNn3R+41PVRY1K8y JZSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXbBLHueI5tUdzgBAacYvPxAzdMHuVkWyCBRh0epEnRMVJrMLev hT0aYMQ7JPeQjrzRLj+IpYWK0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw/gMmQQJ9ir/gx3iHXpaMoj2RQ1ibv3ZsMai6SyfW/JiBS/hZuYBtLZ3iWedSC6HJ3BYXvpA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:1402:: with SMTP id 2mr6355873pfu.126.1581207564844; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 16:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ripper (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm7385129pfn.4.2020.02.08.16.19.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 Feb 2020 16:19:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 16:18:38 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Doug Anderson Cc: Sharat Masetty , freedreno , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , dri-devel@freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm , LKML , Jordan Crouse , Matthias Kaehlcke Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add A618 gpu dt blob Message-ID: <20200209001838.GF955802@ripper> References: <1580886097-6312-1-git-send-email-smasetty@codeaurora.org> <1580886097-6312-4-git-send-email-smasetty@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed 05 Feb 11:24 PST 2020, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:02 PM Sharat Masetty wrote: > > > > + power-domains = <&gpucc CX_GDSC>, <&gpucc GX_GDSC>; > > I should note that this is going to be a PITA to land because the > patch adding "GX_GDSC" should technically land in the "clk" tree. > Without extra work that's going to mean waiting for a full Linux > release before Bjorn and Andy can land. It might be worth sticking > the hardcoded "1" in for now instead of "GX_GDSC". That's what we > often do in cases like this. > I'm fine with the patches using the GX_GDSC define and I will replace it if necessary when applying the patch - but either way we this is dependent on the clock tree picking up the patch that defines the value. Regards, Bjorn