From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41B5C3B188 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8E1218AC for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729557AbgBMKyU (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:54:20 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44846 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726232AbgBMKyU (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:54:20 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804641FB; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 134BA3F6CF; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:54:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:54:13 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: peng.fan@nxp.com Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports Message-ID: <20200213105413.GA23374@bogus> References: <1581566330-1029-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> <1581566330-1029-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1581566330-1029-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:58:49AM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports. Since there is no > standardized id, we need to use vendor specific id. So > add into devicetree binding doc. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > index f493d69e6194..dacc62dc248b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node. > protocol identifier for a given sub-node. > - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size > associated with it. > +- smc-id : SMC id required when using smc or hvc transports IIUC, "arm,smc-id" is preferred more. Why did you drop "arm,scmi-smc" ? -- Regards, Sudeep