devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for R5F subsystem on TI K3 SoCs
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 10:28:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326162802.GA32328@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324201819.23095-4-s-anna@ti.com>

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:18:15 -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> The Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one or more dual-core
> Arm Cortex R5F processor subsystems/clusters (R5FSS). The clusters
> can be split between multiple voltage domains as well. Add the device
> tree bindings document for these R5F subsystem devices. These R5F
> processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory carveout
> regions matching the firmware image addresses. The nodes require more
> than one memory region, with the first memory region used for DMA
> allocations at runtime. The remaining memory regions are reserved
> and are used for the loading and running of the R5F remote processors.
> The R5F processors can also optionally use any internal on-chip SRAM
> memories either for executing code or using it as fast-access data.
> 
> The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the single R5FSS device
> present on K3 AM65x family of SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> Hi Rob,
> 
> The dt_bindings_check seems to throw couple of warnings around the
> usage of ranges because the tooling is adding the #address-cells
> and #size-cells of 1 by default, whereas our actual code uses 2.
> No issues are found with dtbs_check.
> 
> regards
> Suman
> 
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml  | 338 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 338 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.example.dts:23.13-20: Warning (ranges_format): /example-0/reserved-memory:ranges: empty "ranges" property but its #address-cells (2) differs from /example-0 (1)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.example.dts:23.13-20: Warning (ranges_format): /example-0/reserved-memory:ranges: empty "ranges" property but its #size-cells (2) differs from /example-0 (1)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.example.dts:54.13-56.72: Warning (ranges_format): /example-0/interconnect@100000:ranges: "ranges" property has invalid length (72 bytes) (parent #address-cells == 1, child #address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 2)
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.example.dt.yaml: interconnect@100000: $nodename:0: 'interconnect@100000' does not match '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.example.dt.yaml: interconnect@28380000: $nodename:0: 'interconnect@28380000' does not match '^(bus|soc|axi|ahb|apb)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$'
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.example.dt.yaml: mcu-ram@41c00000: 'r5f-sram@0' does not match any of the regexes: '^([a-z]*-)?sram(-section)?@[a-f0-9]+$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.example.dt.yaml: mcu-ram@41c00000: $nodename:0: 'mcu-ram@41c00000' does not match '^sram(@.*)?'

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1260966

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date:

pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-24 20:18 [PATCH 0/7] TI K3 R5F remoteproc support Suman Anna
2020-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] remoteproc: add prepare and unprepare ops Suman Anna
2020-03-26 19:50   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-06 17:20   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-08 23:39     ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/7] remoteproc: use a local copy for the name field Suman Anna
2020-03-26  5:42   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-26 14:01     ` Suman Anna
2020-03-26 19:43       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-03-26 20:35         ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for R5F subsystem on TI K3 SoCs Suman Anna
2020-03-26 16:28   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2020-03-26 18:09     ` Suman Anna
2020-03-26 16:53   ` Rob Herring
2020-04-09  0:02     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09  0:15       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-06 19:59   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09  0:12     ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Add TI-SCI processor control helper functions Suman Anna
2020-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH 5/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Add a remoteproc driver for R5F subsystem Suman Anna
2020-04-07 18:08   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09  0:26     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-08 19:38   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 22:30     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 21:25   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 22:44     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-16 20:11       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH 6/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Initialize TCM memories for ECC Suman Anna
2020-04-09 21:36   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 22:01     ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 20:18 ` [PATCH 7/7] remoteproc/k3-r5: Add loading support for on-chip SRAM regions Suman Anna
2020-04-10 20:30   ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200326162802.GA32328@bogus \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).