From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D09C43331 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8374206F6 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="whqKtXpk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727185AbgC0Nuy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:50:54 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:34598 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726959AbgC0Nuy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:50:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZmrosSOSmZxAWvgu57rbrPTBCBczlHI5pipwE1/4i5U=; b=whqKtXpkvWx0vaG3RjWgT3a4t h/WkrtH3PNnYtv6+wewbkDneaO+/jogZfgBBcLusiv4bio5P77BmsL7dFhweB4jpAeqe/hnGpYv+f OA6+y31O2Vs23//cktCvrF0Wvg3z6Vbcw0w/H86QnC0gDOf2CVxc58r/pFJZaqltyVAtVqGAbL6O/ vDnFoYAwYQxyiP6XCV/FQQKA07QiEnbyGWtsaYmseZqq/Xznu5qTycL4Cax0ixvd/X+rd9VlaN5G5 vdDj0DbTkpc7CPM/WP74rD5ttR08A8T8ZB28wjvXvUp3ocSAwXZ+4X0Cb7frLO4XxgxBGQKz12zSy Wk3pHi7FA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:42074) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jHpNo-0001Ou-5t; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:50:48 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jHpNm-0004HG-RF; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:50:46 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:50:46 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , "Madalin Bucur (OSS)" , Gregory Clement , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: update SolidRun Armada 8040 phy interface types Message-ID: <20200327135046.GN25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200327134319.GD11004@lunn.ch> <20200327134651.GM25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200327134651.GM25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:46:52PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:43:19PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:40:42PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > > > Update the SolidRun Armada 8040 platforms phy interface types from the > > > old 10gbase-kr to the newer and more correct 10gbase-r. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn > > > > Can we add a fixes: tag to this? So it gets backported to the point > > 10gbase-r was added. > > I think "carefully" is the answer. It's not just the point where > 10gbase-r was added because there's a whole bunch of other patches > that are also required to the various ethernet and PHY drivers, SFP > and phylink. It's probably going to take a bit to work that out, > get it wrong and stuff will break. ... and actually there is no point. It is _way_ too soon to even start thinking of using 10GKR for its true purpose - the patches to add 10GBASER were only merged for v5.6-rc1, so we're still waiting for a kernel with that update to be released. In other words, there's no stable kernels to backport it to yet. Do we want it to go into -rc? If so, it also needs to be thoroughly tested. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up