From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: "Ramuthevar,
Vadivel MuruganX" <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, cheol.yong.kim@intel.com,
hauke.mehrtens@intel.com, qi-ming.wu@intel.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
arnd@arndb.de, richard@nod.at, brendanhiggins@google.com,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, masonccyang@mxic.com.tw,
andriy.shevchenko@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 09:54:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200428095459.6727fab0@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ebc42d9-f8a8-0764-ff7f-82beeb0b5bb7@linux.intel.com>
Hello,
"Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
<vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote on Tue, 28 Apr 2020
15:50:06 +0800:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On 28/4/2020 3:40 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Vadivel MuruganX,
> >
> > "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
> > <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote on Tue, 28 Apr 2020
> > 14:50:35 +0800:
> >
> >> Hi Boris,
> >>
> >> On 28/4/2020 2:47 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:40:58 +0800
> >>> "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
> >>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>> Hi Boris,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 28/4/2020 2:27 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:17:30 +0800
> >>>>> "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
> >>>>> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>> Hi Miquel,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you very much for the review comments and your time...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 27/4/2020 11:51 pm, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Ramuthevar,
> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +static int ebu_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>>>>>>>> + struct ebu_nand_controller *ebu_host;
> >>>>>>>>> + struct nand_chip *nand;
> >>>>>>>>> + phys_addr_t nandaddr_pa;
> >>>>>>>>> + struct mtd_info *mtd;
> >>>>>>>>> + struct resource *res;
> >>>>>>>>> + int ret;
> >>>>>>>>> + u32 cs;
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ebu_host), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>>>> + if (!ebu_host)
> >>>>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host->dev = dev;
> >>>>>>>>> + nand_controller_init(&ebu_host->controller);
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "ebunand");
> >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host->ebu_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> >>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(ebu_host->ebu_addr))
> >>>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(ebu_host->ebu_addr);
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "hsnand");
> >>>>>>>>> + ebu_host->nand_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> >>>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(ebu_host->nand_addr))
> >>>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(ebu_host->nand_addr);
> >>>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "nand,cs", &cs);
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> CS ids should be encoded in the reg property (see [1]).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is it your choice to only support a single CS or is it actually a
> >>>>>>> controller limitation?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes , its controller limitation to support only one CS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm pretty sure that's not true, otherwise you wouldn't have to select
> >>>>> the CS you want to use :P.
> >>>>
> >>>> At a time it supports only one chip select.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, like 99% of the NAND controllers, but that doesn't mean you can't
> >>> support multi-CS chips. All you have to do is attach an array of
> >>> ebu_nand_cs to your ebu_nand_chip (as done in the atmel driver I
> >>> pointed to). nand_operation.cs tells you which CS (index in your
> >>> ebu_nand_cs array) a specific operation is targeting, and you can pick
> >>> the right MMIO range/reg value based on that.
> >>
> >> Agreed, sure I will add that and update next series of patches .
> >
> > There are also many other places where you assume blindly that there
> > is only one CS. You can check the Atmel NAND controller driver as Boris
> > said and we will probably propose more little changes to be more
> > generic.
> since LGM EBU_NAND controller supports only one chip select at a time, so assumed like that, will change as generic way if consider like more chip select supports, Thanks!
What do you mean "at a time"?
Do we have access to the spec or a register map? We could tell you very
quickly if it is worth the trouble. But I am pretty sure as well that
the controller supports more than 1 CS.
> Sure , I will do the changes as per your review comments.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Miquèl
> >
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-28 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 16:21 [PATCH v3 0/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-23 16:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add YAML for Nand Flash Controller support Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-29 11:50 ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-23 16:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel LGM SoC Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-24 16:36 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-27 4:17 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-27 15:51 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-28 6:17 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-28 6:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-28 6:40 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-28 6:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-04-28 6:50 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-28 7:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-04-28 7:50 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-28 7:54 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-04-28 8:28 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
2020-04-28 8:41 ` Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200428095459.6727fab0@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=cheol.yong.kim@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hauke.mehrtens@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=masonccyang@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=qi-ming.wu@intel.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).