devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
To: agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: nishakumari@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	kgunda@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] regulator: Allow regulators to verify enabled during enable()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 21:16:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200528154625.17742-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528154625.17742-1-sumit.semwal@linaro.org>

Some regulators might need to verify that they have indeed been enabled
after the enable() call is made and enable_time delay has passed.

This is implemented by repeatedly checking is_enabled() upto
poll_enabled_time, waiting for the already calculated enable delay in
each iteration.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c         | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/regulator/driver.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 7486f6e4e613..06199f182114 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2409,6 +2409,34 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 
 	_regulator_enable_delay(delay);
 
+	/* If set, poll upto poll_enabled_time uS to see if the regulator
+	 * actually got enabled.
+	 * For each iteration, wait for the enable_time delay calculated
+	 * above already.
+	 * If the regulator isn't enabled after poll_enabled_time has
+	 * expired, return -ETIMEDOUT.
+	 */
+	if (rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time) {
+		unsigned int time_remaining = rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time;
+
+		while (time_remaining > 0) {
+			/* We've already waited for enable_time above;
+			 * so we can start with immediate check of the
+			 * status of the regulator.
+			 */
+			if (rdev->desc->ops->is_enabled(rdev))
+				break;
+
+			_regulator_enable_delay(delay);
+			time_remaining -= delay;
+		}
+
+		if (time_remaining <= 0) {
+			rdev_err(rdev, "Enabled check failed.\n");
+			return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		}
+	}
+
 	trace_regulator_enable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
index 29d920516e0b..bb50e943010f 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
@@ -322,6 +322,9 @@ enum regulator_type {
  * @enable_time: Time taken for initial enable of regulator (in uS).
  * @off_on_delay: guard time (in uS), before re-enabling a regulator
  *
+ * @poll_enabled_time: Maximum time (in uS) to poll if the regulator is
+ *                          actually enabled, after enable() call
+ *
  * @of_map_mode: Maps a hardware mode defined in a DeviceTree to a standard mode
  */
 struct regulator_desc {
@@ -389,6 +392,8 @@ struct regulator_desc {
 
 	unsigned int off_on_delay;
 
+	unsigned int poll_enabled_time;
+
 	unsigned int (*of_map_mode)(unsigned int mode);
 };
 
-- 
2.26.2


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28 15:46 [PATCH v3 0/5] Qualcomm labibb regulator driver Sumit Semwal
2020-05-28 15:46 ` Sumit Semwal [this message]
2020-05-29  1:37   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] regulator: Allow regulators to verify enabled during enable() Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-29 10:50     ` Mark Brown
2020-05-29 10:54   ` Mark Brown
2020-05-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: regulator: Add labibb regulator Sumit Semwal
2020-05-29  3:01   ` Rob Herring
2020-05-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi8998: Add nodes for LAB and IBB regulators Sumit Semwal
2020-05-29  1:43   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] regulator: qcom: Add labibb driver Sumit Semwal
2020-05-29  2:04   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: qcom: labibb: Add SC interrupt handling Sumit Semwal
2020-05-29  2:28   ` Bjorn Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200528154625.17742-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --to=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nishakumari@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).