From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19EAC433DF for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4133207F9 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 22:52:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590706368; bh=Ci5Q9Rz1oBZG4KK23knviog2z7Dbw0z2Q0/7CIJpeMk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=jkZ7GLTSHwFoVnPvaOT2+n5bqGJ19skrp7d895T0gtTSLtI6VWLS/Cm6tvVdDcJLW LYFGet13S/03/tdV1Dfatm55VSMGmQPYRzKVm/hDgKwfR+Pww5N2UG5ig5ljU+26sO UgmQfsFZQoG25KyBqrdgd1Loja4+s3cTB/7VM8+U= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2437276AbgE1Wws (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 18:52:48 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-f196.google.com ([209.85.166.196]:37991 "EHLO mail-il1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2437268AbgE1Wwr (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 18:52:47 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-f196.google.com with SMTP id q18so640223ilm.5; Thu, 28 May 2020 15:52:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0vhQp9XNZNfZUF651FAD7AKZcJtfFmbMwFLrNqs62EI=; b=U1S3miAEvCIJT0Du4xWtkhwP8n1lXdu/mOvFp+q+74TYHFdt+HmwopgaEor68hVlF1 LOmQQPkikBxgb5AkNb/qlXhBvrgH1okhl7lwcudA0Cxz5/0/DXsgQKxtl8RnI8QUyUay uo29qG1b4SNfzfhNLFebfoZafaS2DP+Z05d4ChCCntYBznE3Ipxs68c5dRpQ+Y9X8tKI uLsdnhJeF1Vh8uIMAp7J9bcRClhii6gmmi3NR2ahxUtmGtdT8Gel1OU2Bq8THEONmdiL p9q0A5K+BfW+eRSrWuBwMMGl3ZOLNawYnT4/+dQOjLXMkmaA5n5tBeVQvZLSlL7sXePZ tDRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JOBeDHJgeTs6YKIoNSQhjBs3GA71h2BUyyYU4nZeUsDSfWnFG +R3A7T2QxWUTnX46sAJguQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfyyr0KlQzRC18dEL6/3PLPwBdp8yogKP7UhKR3e9n5p0nKXKeN/j2owSpSRZWGV9PJz9CoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:11a5:: with SMTP id 5mr5080394ilj.108.1590706366514; Thu, 28 May 2020 15:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 ([64.188.179.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w29sm2074753ila.26.2020.05.28.15.52.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 May 2020 15:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 827788 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 28 May 2020 22:52:44 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:52:44 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Lubomir Rintel Cc: Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Lezcano , Jason Cooper , Linus Walleij , Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Ulf Hansson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs Message-ID: <20200528225244.GA815881@bogus> References: <20200521091356.2211020-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200521091356.2211020-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:13:47AM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > Hi, > > chained to this message is a second version of remaining patches from the > first spin of the "DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs" [1] patch set. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200317093922.20785-1-lkundrak@v3.sk/ > > I've attempted to address the review of the v1, each patch includes a > detailed change log. > > Compared to v1, wherever the license or maintainer information was > missing, I've filled in GPL-2.0-only and people listed in MAINTAINERS > file. As I've indicated in v1 cover letter, am not sure whether this is > the optimal course of action. However I've included the relevant people > in v1 Cc list and asked for clarifications, but didn't really get any > feedback to that. Find someone that would care if the bindings are deleted. I'm fine if you put yourself. Maybe subsystem maintainers are willing to take orphans. I really only want my name on common things. Rob