From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734C8C433E0 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 18:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5384920722 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 18:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729183AbgE3SOs (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2020 14:14:48 -0400 Received: from v6.sk ([167.172.42.174]:45050 "EHLO v6.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729151AbgE3SOs (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2020 14:14:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (v6.sk [IPv6:::1]) by v6.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FAD610D9; Sat, 30 May 2020 18:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 20:14:42 +0200 From: Lubomir Rintel To: Rob Herring Cc: Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Bartosz Golaszewski , Daniel Lezcano , Jason Cooper , Linus Walleij , Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Ulf Hansson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs Message-ID: <20200530181442.GC2870@furthur.local> References: <20200521091356.2211020-1-lkundrak@v3.sk> <20200528225244.GA815881@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200528225244.GA815881@bogus> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:52:44PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:13:47AM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > chained to this message is a second version of remaining patches from the > > first spin of the "DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs" [1] patch set. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200317093922.20785-1-lkundrak@v3.sk/ > > > > I've attempted to address the review of the v1, each patch includes a > > detailed change log. > > > > Compared to v1, wherever the license or maintainer information was > > missing, I've filled in GPL-2.0-only and people listed in MAINTAINERS > > file. As I've indicated in v1 cover letter, am not sure whether this is > > the optimal course of action. However I've included the relevant people > > in v1 Cc list and asked for clarifications, but didn't really get any > > feedback to that. > > Find someone that would care if the bindings are deleted. I'm fine > if you put yourself. Maybe subsystem maintainers are willing to take > orphans. I really only want my name on common things. Thanks for clarification & fixups to the patches. I'm wondering if Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.rst could perhaps be made a bit clearer about how the maintainer key in a binding document is different from what is in the MAINTAINERS file. > Rob Lubo