From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670EAC433DF for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A399206DC for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="rJgQArWM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726546AbgFKQIl (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:08:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47144 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726095AbgFKQIl (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2020 12:08:41 -0400 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc2:55:216:3eff:fef7:d647]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D8C3C08C5C1 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (81-175-216-236.bb.dnainternet.fi [81.175.216.236]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8742D24F; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:08:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1591891718; bh=jlW4b5AG5wwpqPodl7+wSfpNr7n8QxJCTCiAHHSO2z0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rJgQArWMykr86hC6S/z6A49E9WFqEfSoOuOnDevnRMkgif9FNpo2FEG6Pg0Xsw9sx eEo8pW1eeQZnEYg9N/IRUoO5CJjblOK1CQQvO665RDb561+TnK6GMHRvavCcORARv3 247hPGH3b9vehgfJAPnPBIJ71VnYsUkWQDdwof60= Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 19:08:17 +0300 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Ricardo =?utf-8?Q?Ca=C3=B1uelo?= Cc: kernel@collabora.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: display: ti,tfp410.yaml: make the ports node optional Message-ID: <20200611160817.GA6031@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> References: <20200611102356.31563-1-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com> <20200611102356.31563-6-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200611102356.31563-6-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Ricardo, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > Make the ports node optional, since there are some DTs that don't define > any ports for ti,tfp410. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo Shouldn't we fix those DTs instead ? What's the point of a TFP410 without ports in DT ? > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml > index 605831c1e836..1c9421eb80fa 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml > @@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ properties: > > required: > - compatible > - - ports > > if: > required: -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart