From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2A0C433DF for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A132E20810 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592433455; bh=/UaB+o/ziKRXfcGb24Jqg9Bvptn9+1rRn8vhhGb2SFw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=NgwyfsT5kBFtdYnTxG1ALQzvkeh+dReW3he3ao0gpJ1kybuF63UujnOkl6Ey6boVI 4gTRLVzBFqv1HZXcC0nVbs7mBbQ6kH6RoIni1kgR7B9C+N6zRmPALRUl85sbKxNN4q dWBtkEWuEfq5Ogma0NXLPygFtkiXpCTOfr6ohnzk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727054AbgFQWhf (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:37:35 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-f194.google.com ([209.85.166.194]:33910 "EHLO mail-il1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727001AbgFQWhf (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:37:35 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-f194.google.com with SMTP id x18so3960262ilp.1 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:37:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=ZpqmM5b2vnIEZM+uoBwaGezs/bIVuA8qCIC5e2tj4Mk=; b=odAd1d2M498/jjPe08PWr0c1GHtaQvuczQxTTEeeu8fntREEYUeJ5QsPIsqNuu0JAe 3KB2u9QhVw5FK2/JngxvtmzLwl1XVs8uUx4HRf4V3NF5wTbTQCjtRH0LsecUeqeN5REH WSQZHDgoHbnkG3mfczdBxKf3EypY3yELcNOm3i3GoQbkZxmpnVjMOl35o7XfmMok/yJw KWhWVkPG0Jbr8wdQR3uoCAYzgBmlDBFmKcPruzhWj+z9Ccf6vPf3Xv5HRoWY9ZyllsBl +2YouWe6v8QZRcIxdw4lGIim8qs6SgqsY2XUb9jj8QNZCaxk5DoSaudZxAKa0nEEOeTC eHKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UHotr9DCQeexlvwWnlvCmdCXH//Y4BucYzzQ/fj7yQR/7fR+B 4Ov80PpyCULciSgq2G/Hog== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAq5HXFt/cfdAiAR+bnOeSiQTllpHYl1CjJVPEXer5Qdf+2qJhDdxmi+THg3z+2BKJ3Mb/mA== X-Received: by 2002:a92:190:: with SMTP id 138mr1144486ilb.5.1592433454005; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 ([64.188.179.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm717751iov.53.2020.06.17.15.37.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 2965169 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:37:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:37:32 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Ricardo =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ca=F1uelo?= Cc: Laurent Pinchart , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, kernel@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] dt-bindings: display: ti,tfp410.yaml: make the ports node optional Message-ID: <20200617223732.GB2953201@bogus> References: <20200611102356.31563-1-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com> <20200611102356.31563-6-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com> <20200611160817.GA6031@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> <8ad9a397a5fa6cebd2a4e0170dfa96ad73907faf.camel@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8ad9a397a5fa6cebd2a4e0170dfa96ad73907faf.camel@collabora.com> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:38:07AM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > Thanks for reviewing the patch > > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 19:08 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Ricardo, > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > > > Make the ports node optional, since there are some DTs that don't define > > > any ports for ti,tfp410. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo > > > > Shouldn't we fix those DTs instead ? What's the point of a TFP410 > > without ports in DT ? > > This comes from the discussion in the previous version of this series. > > In the DTs that don't define any ports (it's dove-sbc-a510.dts only, actually) > it's not clear how to define the ports (I'm not familiar with this board). > Initially I defined a set of empty ports just to comply with the binding > requirements, but Rob suggested that we might as well declare them as optional, > since having an empty port definition with no remote endpoints is no better than > having no ports at all. I did? Must have missed some context. > I understand both opinions but I just don't know which is the best option at > this point. Just leave the warning to be fixed. Rob