From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
To: agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: nishakumari@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
kgunda@codeaurora.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] regulator: Allow regulators to verify enabled during enable()
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:11:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200622124110.20971-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200622124110.20971-1-sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Some regulators might need to verify that they have indeed been enabled
after the enable() call is made and enable_time delay has passed.
This is implemented by repeatedly checking is_enabled() upto
poll_enabled_time, waiting for the already calculated enable delay in
each iteration.
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
---
v3: addressed minor review comments, improved kernel doc
v2: Address review comments, including swapping enable_time and poll_enabled_time.
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 5 +++
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 03154f5b939f..538a2779986a 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2347,6 +2347,37 @@ static void _regulator_enable_delay(unsigned int delay)
udelay(us);
}
+/**
+ * _regulator_check_status_enabled
+ *
+ * A helper function to check if the regulator status can be interpreted
+ * as 'regulator is enabled'.
+ * @rdev: the regulator device to check
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * * 1 - if status shows regulator is in enabled state
+ * * 0 - if not enabled state
+ * * Error Value - as received from ops->get_status()
+ */
+static inline int _regulator_check_status_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ int ret = rdev->desc->ops->get_status(rdev);
+
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ rdev_info(rdev, "get_status returned error: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ switch (ret) {
+ case REGULATOR_STATUS_OFF:
+ case REGULATOR_STATUS_ERROR:
+ case REGULATOR_STATUS_UNDEFINED:
+ return 0;
+ default:
+ return 1;
+ }
+}
+
static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
int ret, delay;
@@ -2407,7 +2438,37 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
* together. */
trace_regulator_enable_delay(rdev_get_name(rdev));
- _regulator_enable_delay(delay);
+ /* If poll_enabled_time is set, poll upto the delay calculated
+ * above, delaying poll_enabled_time uS to check if the regulator
+ * actually got enabled.
+ * If the regulator isn't enabled after enable_delay has
+ * expired, return -ETIMEDOUT.
+ */
+ if (rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time) {
+ unsigned int time_remaining = delay;
+
+ while (time_remaining > 0) {
+ _regulator_enable_delay(rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time);
+
+ if (rdev->desc->ops->get_status) {
+ ret = _regulator_check_status_enabled(rdev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ else if (ret)
+ break;
+ } else if (rdev->desc->ops->is_enabled(rdev))
+ break;
+
+ time_remaining -= rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time;
+ }
+
+ if (time_remaining <= 0) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "Enabled check timed out\n");
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+ }
+ } else {
+ _regulator_enable_delay(delay);
+ }
trace_regulator_enable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
index 7eb9fea8e482..436df3ba0b2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/regulator/driver.h
@@ -305,6 +305,9 @@ enum regulator_type {
* @enable_time: Time taken for initial enable of regulator (in uS).
* @off_on_delay: guard time (in uS), before re-enabling a regulator
*
+ * @poll_enabled_time: The polling interval (in uS) to use while checking that
+ * the regulator was actually enabled. Max upto enable_time.
+ *
* @of_map_mode: Maps a hardware mode defined in a DeviceTree to a standard mode
*/
struct regulator_desc {
@@ -372,6 +375,8 @@ struct regulator_desc {
unsigned int off_on_delay;
+ unsigned int poll_enabled_time;
+
unsigned int (*of_map_mode)(unsigned int mode);
};
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-22 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-22 12:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] Qualcomm labibb regulator driver Sumit Semwal
2020-06-22 12:41 ` Sumit Semwal [this message]
2020-06-22 12:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: regulator: Add labibb regulator Sumit Semwal
2020-07-09 22:12 ` Rob Herring
2020-06-22 12:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: pmi8998: Add nodes for LAB and IBB regulators Sumit Semwal
2020-06-22 12:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] regulator: qcom: Add labibb driver Sumit Semwal
2020-07-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Qualcomm labibb regulator driver Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200622124110.20971-2-sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--to=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgunda@codeaurora.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishakumari@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).