From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB20AC433E0 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC74D206CD for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:50:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594147855; bh=q1dR/jTPZVK8xl37KWCnPKEDb2AOMCbqOvChW4D47CU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=n2JeD9WngE9rbVNOT2i9CMGnh26EZP5yEjdEpOzjMzZeNcu3GT0bbr9Yh9H4YiYlB PyV+J4qkUCZ4rdprdJijc1coz2YgJefLPvKazgRWEEfBG/NRlFOhAwRzOAEZM5Ppxw 2azzPNueAHUKeOdWeVRaGLuVPOjsjJSY3x3Hozrk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728249AbgGGSuz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:50:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:36788 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728149AbgGGSuz (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:50:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id 17so193930wmo.1; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:50:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=m/t4PDWucGx9E7+lQRxXkI+ujQ2IZO1RtvREvMleNek=; b=XYeRo8UuqhamN5mxrIR+8yPg8YOy2sTA77fV1exURMx1f/eYvCpMashZ6MsTQuuxSq PHZJSmm52aColg3xteJFnkDJf/HgMR8rKdDO5uwJjQUl3+DmssxODEEUiBbj/hqw+oDH QlQgpqq7KITu7HjQZ/ogYmLgJjh8lH4ROPvzW/nfHBLLg8HEEZNGn1umScGjxw6H8E7Z C9uJVG3UtIQsKDk4QDdEYPIBuMEuehWbkYjNkRZf4AvMC7WBw+JnDKY9gf+OT0cr0Xrv VNRax9ytJOk+g1o5+ObsNcyq4uGDUri41NhY338KaaFDOMGTd8KVA+QNGEym3BHNkGd5 iFhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532YeTzozaK3JgBFKjDhy69Q02HaFCrToLi2I9r0a19YFQ77p2LN e3iQEYSrkgFqNpc39fkLEhc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyeYxQzWHl3HP96w4mkIZMaje9wIX3EMZDnNv2vf2IMnQnRi6Mcgqa62eD6LSqOcYGyqZ2I6A== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc08:: with SMTP id f8mr5884261wmh.106.1594147852592; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kozik-lap ([194.230.155.195]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id p25sm1909109wmg.39.2020.07.07.11.50.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:50:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:50:49 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= Cc: Thierry Reding , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Kukjin Kim , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Sylwester Nawrocki , Alim Akhtar , Chanwoo Choi , Pankaj Dubey Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: pwm: samsung: Do not require interrupts on Exynos SoCs Message-ID: <20200707185049.GA4698@kozik-lap> References: <20200702155149.12854-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200706094157.kyag7p5df3vo54wx@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20200706094157.kyag7p5df3vo54wx@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:41:57AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > The bindings required interrupts for all SoCs but actually only the PWM > > timer clocksource (for S3C/S5P SoCs) was using them. This PWM timer > > clocksource driver is not used on Exynos SoCs thus the interrupts can be > > marked as optional. > > > > Reported-by: Alim Akhtar > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > LGTM, > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > I'd expect it is ok to let this patch go in via whatever way the other > patches go. (But it's Thierry who has the authority here.) This patch is independent so it can go either through PWM tree or DT bindings. Usually the latter, so Rob was picking it up. Thanks for ack. Best regards, Krzysztof