Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: sdm845-dispcc: same name for dp_phy clocks as sc7180

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 02 Sep 2020 14:38:41 -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> This makes it easier to combine dt bindings for sdm845/sc7180 dispcc.
> 
> Note: nothing upstream provides these clocks and the sdm845 dispcc driver
> hasn't switched to using .fw_name for these clocks (these properties are
> ignored), so changing this shouldn't be a problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-dispcc.yaml         | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 


My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-dispcc.example.dt.yaml: clock-controller@af00000: clock-names:7: 'dp_phy_pll_link_clk' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-dispcc.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-dispcc.example.dt.yaml: clock-controller@af00000: clock-names:8: 'dp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk' was expected
	From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sdm845-dispcc.yaml


See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1356040

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date:

pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.