From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495B6C433E2 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027A92080A for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 20:35:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599597318; bh=3bRzqD7N9tZlBsrAcuPk8G+Tm1RoNmang1ACkhJ8F6U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=gzI3yyl5kmeJSWnh34k8ILq0Xxi6K1T/ORyZ9YIfgUVrPaf9SWt/shP8TGBiqAfqR daMvdQiTw7T+yAllKPpKJxcxBUuvpKgRuxfg9H/NBmiPM6YdsZpX8eR6IvMxOLI6Of mxcfRj/h6nvjFJGuebXp5mY2CeoSfhyLr4MeGmJs= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726484AbgIHUfR (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:35:17 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:40266 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725997AbgIHUfR (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:35:17 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id j2so782735ioj.7; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:35:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=N8TMTkjL+HXBkd31RAbWRN3OkDrpVAsSr5h0Vt07iso=; b=DqKfxY0IySEkqh6plyyANgifRxNeFE/KFbCRJJCkYDfzv7R/t2zvl8GKdxzMs5+vYc etdpIpvlKub4FSPDY3c/k/tN88ai+QLwjfX0UuLxIja2z4rnJ5Ntc8OIdfBDSWRyODXN VdyN0eFMqYj9UbYTh8GoZ+ucQABoUSa0+aL6FEH0qrt7uii1qbEHGoQ2tB/gKx/jNsap RUog9KE4kTkAw+k1P8ABTTNyyVqydGWQaJ9Z66JYyxe4bpEV0JOQBFtd+CJ8+Aom0X2/ HtmAe1XpCyZsgp1osEbu53TR305SP+7w76uSlvcz3cyj/ZQDc4BtLntJA//0xoa+Zrxk b+1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZQKDmJmmmLiomlk/1lKXvoowehpcy4cGtnGSI0VBCUV6ixrW2 BK786iZGlAldTVqLzODllnNbGflX/gzC X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNszEz/h0w+B+3k77krDbp4ZMOTh6PZpaxVniETcrMG+nXiWDeI6mT5xAMx5erE4/iZbmOUg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:ec5:: with SMTP id q5mr760716jas.13.1599597315710; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 ([64.188.179.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x24sm121100ilk.82.2020.09.08.13.35.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 870794 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:35:14 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 14:35:14 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Anilkumar Kolli Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] dt: bindings: net: update compatible for ath11k Message-ID: <20200908203514.GA870402@bogus> References: <1599551717-3801-1-git-send-email-akolli@codeaurora.org> <010101746cb6751a-ca300933-1174-4534-a01b-b1dbf1c1f305-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <010101746cb6751a-ca300933-1174-4534-a01b-b1dbf1c1f305-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:55:31 +0000, Anilkumar Kolli wrote: > Add IPQ6018 wireless driver support, > its based on ath11k driver. > > Signed-off-by: Anilkumar Kolli > --- > V3: > - Use 'enum' rather than oneOf+const. > V4: > - removed oneOf, use just enum (Rob) > V5: > - Fixes errors in 'make dt_binding_check' (Rob) > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath11k.yaml | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.