From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092C5C433E2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69F62145D for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 09:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726060AbgIIJ1a (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 05:27:30 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:54496 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725826AbgIIJ13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 05:27:29 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 716721C0B87; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:27:25 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Alexander Dahl Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Jacek Anaszewski , Alexander Dahl , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Dan Murphy , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] leds: pwm: Make automatic labels work Message-ID: <20200909092725.GD14289@amd> References: <20200831210232.28052-1-post@lespocky.de> <2019500.FJf2EgCAKA@ada> <20200909090033.GD10891@amd> <1670070.OCB1Fln39h@ada> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uxuisgdDHaNETlh8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1670070.OCB1Fln39h@ada> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > Besides: those suggestions are obviously valid for new bindings. What > > > about old bindings (.txt), which had no explicit SPDX tag or license = note > > > before? What license would apply there? Is the .yaml file technically > > > new, when it was mostly just converted from .txt? > >=20 > > If it is based on previous .txt binding, you have to respect previous > > author's license. That probably means GPL-2.0 only. >=20 > Probably? I have not checked exact licensing situation of that text, have not decided if it was copyrightable in the first place, and am not a lawyer. So... probably :-). Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAl9Yn/0ACgkQMOfwapXb+vKBNwCaAiwL8PTenU6t8p0eeFTwOAFZ zDwAnjLM5GgoSjCflS2WRK1odwSIbLDD =vCS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8--