From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: "Viorel Suman (OSS)" <viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>,
Cosmin-Gabriel Samoila <cosmin.samoila@nxp.com>,
Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@nxp.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: Add XCVR ASoC CPU DAI driver
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 00:14:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917071431.GA17970@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1600247876-8013-2-git-send-email-viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
Hi Viorel,
It looks pretty clean to me, though some small comments inline.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:17:55PM +0300, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> From: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@nxp.com>
>
> XCVR (Audio Transceiver) is a on-chip functional module found
> on i.MX8MP. It support HDMI2.1 eARC, HDMI1.4 ARC and SPDIF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@nxp.com>
> +static const u32 fsl_xcvr_earc_channels[] = { 1, 2, 8, 16, 32, }; /* one bit 6, 12 ? */
What's the meaning of the comments?
> +static const int fsl_xcvr_phy_arc_cfg[] = {
> + FSL_XCVR_PHY_CTRL_ARC_MODE_SE_EN, FSL_XCVR_PHY_CTRL_ARC_MODE_CM_EN,
> +};
Nit: better be u32 vs. int?
> +/** phy: true => phy, false => pll */
> +static int fsl_xcvr_ai_write(struct fsl_xcvr *xcvr, u8 reg, u32 data, bool phy)
> +{
> + u32 val, idx, tidx;
> +
> + idx = BIT(phy ? 26 : 24);
> + tidx = BIT(phy ? 27 : 25);
> +
> + regmap_write(xcvr->regmap, FSL_XCVR_PHY_AI_CTRL_CLR, 0xFF);
> + regmap_write(xcvr->regmap, FSL_XCVR_PHY_AI_CTRL_SET, reg);
> + regmap_write(xcvr->regmap, FSL_XCVR_PHY_AI_WDATA, data);
> + regmap_write(xcvr->regmap, FSL_XCVR_PHY_AI_CTRL_TOG, idx);
> +
> + do {
> + regmap_read(xcvr->regmap, FSL_XCVR_PHY_AI_CTRL, &val);
> + } while ((val & idx) != ((val & tidx) >> 1));
Might regmap_read_poll_timeout() be better? And it seems to poll
intentionally with no sleep nor timeout -- would be nice to have
a line of comments to explain why.
> > +static int fsl_xcvr_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct fsl_xcvr *xcvr = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(xcvr->ipg_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to start IPG clock.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(xcvr->pll_ipg_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to start PLL IPG clock.\n");
Should it disable ipg_clk?
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(xcvr->phy_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to start PHY clock: %d\n", ret);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(xcvr->ipg_clk);
Should it disable pll_ipg_clk?
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(xcvr->spba_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to start SPBA clock.\n");
> + clk_disable_unprepare(xcvr->phy_clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(xcvr->ipg_clk);
Ditto
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + regcache_cache_only(xcvr->regmap, false);
> + regcache_mark_dirty(xcvr->regmap);
> + ret = regcache_sync(xcvr->regmap);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to sync regcache.\n");
> + return ret;
What about those clocks? Probably better to have some error-out
labels at the end of the function?
> + }
> +
> + reset_control_assert(xcvr->reset);
> + reset_control_deassert(xcvr->reset);
> +
> + ret = fsl_xcvr_load_firmware(xcvr);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to load firmware.\n");
> + return ret;
Ditto
> + }
> +
> + /* Release M0+ reset */
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(xcvr->regmap, FSL_XCVR_EXT_CTRL,
> + FSL_XCVR_EXT_CTRL_CORE_RESET, 0);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "M0+ core release failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
Ditto
> + }
> + mdelay(50);
Any reason to use mdelay over msleep for a 50ms wait? May add a
line of comments if mdelay is a must?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 9:17 [PATCH 0/2] DAI driver for new XCVR IP Viorel Suman (OSS)
2020-09-16 9:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: fsl_xcvr: Add XCVR ASoC CPU DAI driver Viorel Suman (OSS)
2020-09-17 7:14 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2020-09-18 14:21 ` Viorel Suman (OSS)
2020-09-18 16:06 ` Timur Tabi
2020-09-17 13:53 ` Mark Brown
2020-09-18 15:02 ` Viorel Suman (OSS)
2020-09-18 15:20 ` Mark Brown
2020-09-18 15:33 ` Viorel Suman (OSS)
2020-09-16 9:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_xcvr: Add document for XCVR Viorel Suman (OSS)
2020-09-18 17:23 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917071431.GA17970@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cosmin.samoila@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=viorel.suman@gmail.com \
--cc=viorel.suman@nxp.com \
--cc=viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).