From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AFDC43461 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2502083B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="hK1ItdSA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726959AbgIQNBh (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:01:37 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:37986 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727026AbgIQNBd (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:01:33 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08HD0Yrc059673; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1600347634; bh=228i3kO/ePj4BLGku9Pm9IqvyA00dorq9WbjfzFVaQ4=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=hK1ItdSApIqf0Ze7IciwXSSrujBEszcNjhN7MeBimRALTflBfYIHhgEtY788X4zO7 jyyHus7bmAiHy5p7spvohl2zM11uUq3Ebg8ROQHAHBuynwXJSimAzMDlbu17rxG/Yi YsQpqZCm3q3+HxQPKuEfKCKRmiFmFvqMWXb8vzDc= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08HD0YYH026740 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:34 -0500 Received: from DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08HD0XfG057556; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:00:33 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Peter Rosin CC: Roger Quadros , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mux-j7200-wiz: Add lane function defines Message-ID: <20200917130033.5totdf6mdg3lbbmq@akan> References: <20200915112038.30219-1-rogerq@ti.com> <20200915112038.30219-2-rogerq@ti.com> <20200916154536.m552ft2jzfsaeokr@akan> <20200917122703.ojuzn6b3tvqbnssc@akan> <02d57a88-ba7a-5944-8053-8f4ad03242d2@axentia.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02d57a88-ba7a-5944-8053-8f4ad03242d2@axentia.se> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 14:53-20200917, Peter Rosin wrote: [..] > I do not have a tree and dt-patches should normally not go *through* me. yep. > But I'd still like to see what's happening. > I did not realize this was going to cause a *lot* of churn in the dt > files. How bad can it be when the file is new in this cycle? And is it > worth it? But it seems you all see problems with the current naming and > in that case it must surely be better to fix it early? yes - I think I can figure it out. > > And if it's a lot, maybe it needs to be more than one patch? I get the > feeling this will need to be taken care of by someone other than me, > because I'm just the maintainer of a very small subsystem and I don't > normally have to deal with "big" issues involving several trees. I would > be a bottleneck. No a pain, I think I can help get it through, may be, I worry too much.. Lets see how the cleanup series looks like. Roger: I am not touching the j7200 series till we cleanup j721e as discussed in this thread. please use 5.9-rc1 as your baseline for cleanup. Once available, we can figure out how to get 5.10-rc1 staged items later. Window is narrowing rather soon, so appreciate a quick cleaup :). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D