From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:54:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200917155403.GA21107@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR04MB7157872B1019B748119B7DBA8B3E0@AM7PR04MB7157.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:24:30AM +0000, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > > You may need both (glue & xhci), it depends on system design, and
> > > usually, these two kinds of wakeup setting isn't conflict.
> >
> > Ok, thanks. So if I understand correctly the onboard hub driver should check the
> > wakeup state of the xHCI to determine if remote wakeup is enabled for the
> > controller (after all it doesn't know anything about the platform device).
> > Wakeup might not work properly if it is disabled for the platform device, but it's
> > the responsability of the board software/config to make sure it is enabled
> > (possibly this could be done by making the dwc3-qcom driver understand the
> > 'wakeup-source' property, as the xhci-mtk driver does).
>
> No, every level should handle its own wakeup setting. You may have to do this since the USB bus and platform bus
> are two different buses, you should not visit device structure across the bus. And you don't need a device tree property
> to do it. For platform driver, you could use device_may_wakeup, for onboard hub power driver, you could use
> usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants since you need to cover descendants.
>
> The purpose of these two wakeup logic is different, for USB bus, it is used to tell USB devices to enable remote wakeup
> and do not power off its regulator; for platform bus, it is used to tell the controller to enable its wakeup setting and keep
> the regulator for its USB controller and USB PHY (if needed).
Sorry, I didn't express myself clearly. With the platform device I was
referring to the dwc3-qcom ('glue') in this case, which could check
it's own 'wakeup-source' attribute to enable wakeup at boot. The driver
currently enables wakeup statically. The onboard_hub driver is agnostic
of this device.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-14 18:27 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for onboard USB hubs Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-14 18:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-14 19:52 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-14 20:14 ` Alan Stern
2020-09-14 21:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-15 2:55 ` Peter Chen
2020-09-15 5:02 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-15 7:05 ` Peter Chen
2020-09-15 23:03 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-16 2:14 ` Alan Stern
2020-09-16 19:27 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-16 8:19 ` Peter Chen
2020-09-16 19:16 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-17 0:27 ` Peter Chen
2020-09-17 0:47 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-17 1:24 ` Peter Chen
2020-09-17 15:54 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2020-09-15 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add binding for onboard USB hubs Rob Herring
2020-09-16 0:00 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-18 16:05 ` Rob Herring
2020-09-22 23:39 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-09-15 14:21 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200917155403.GA21107@google.com \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grandmaster@al2klimov.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=ravisadineni@chromium.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).