From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BF8C433E7 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8EE22260 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:43:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602254625; bh=vtQeS7pchcKKqSV0mfRZSgA9o0CE6Ltw931Mn2JLea4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Qni6F+Y7BVorsN6Nm/dE45wdxAlGA2+k3wlxtMHOdGbsn13dUYqW4dOZxgFc0aiiX W9Jix4Xs+WolUpfKr0mWvCYaE6hM9SkNLCubTHLiIr7ly2LJq0rvYsNKRpuULu82I4 a60TrjsspC7haJigzvktIK/MRjqXwxy/MsJP7ZR4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388980AbgJIOnp (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:43:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:35681 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387662AbgJIOno (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:43:44 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id s66so9219529otb.2; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=dOsE09lqg8xfhaENVLTYfHrMNxg+wDtzzAMabberaGg=; b=VDhQGQRin/BrFzeeqiFlp3ngq1mJ+4w2r0WzxIzsarigXYVTfMFo+oBuITWTuonSXH C+lt8RgC74NdvgotKPUx4OLfXXJRHVUet9ube7LEUbjeqtr8iJrmlSue+XNWtkTgdZao uMCZYlsIGxJ42WY7y3m+I7FzXJX6JYbHB+cqABBUu0ApIoxtdouBbWiXbcqNCjvOgq5j tmw7OqthIpW+oeL0Oyl3fFpjapwasUIaMKH2Hi7gxDOJUQ8dkhdh5oUEi3ZHDyvdcS5M XrRG1gwazp4Qm3T2J/dZ8ADhG6PE6qAS0efg10GkwangXU2GToPwN437S/LpSgJi+zzb nW3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rMxoYmNsnVcg5uxsfXjfDfBOw5SZvOGM3Rq1/4N2q+9Xc8nq9 lTCVeW2U26TR27aoYmkjymvznVOET8b1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzObzDE04JdzjIoWiLq5wi7qtxuGZGqWS590nHGfuia4F0wRI98fv8oDheNIT007JEFjKtwyA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6847:: with SMTP id c7mr8586668oto.134.1602254623404; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm7456921oii.45.2020.10.09.07.43.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 4128777 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 14:43:42 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:43:42 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Mike Looijmans Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: gpio: pca953x: Add support for the NXP PCAL9554B/C Message-ID: <20201009144342.GA4128628@bogus> References: <20201009060302.6220-1-mike.looijmans@topic.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201009060302.6220-1-mike.looijmans@topic.nl> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 09 Oct 2020 08:03:02 +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote: > The NXP PCAL9554B is a variant of the PCA953x GPIO expander, > with 8 GPIOs, latched interrupts and some advanced configuration > options. The "C" version only differs in I2C address. > > This adds the entry to the devicetree bindings. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans > --- > v2: Split devicetree and code into separate patches > v3: Devicetree bindings in yaml format > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-pca95xx.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.