From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536D2C388F9 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097E422258 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2898944AbgJ0LHb (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:07:31 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:38360 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2898903AbgJ0LHb (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:07:31 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D8E30E; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 04:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120937-lin (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 321DB3F66E; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 04:07:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:07:25 +0000 From: Cristian Marussi To: kernel test robot Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, broonie@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, satyakim@qti.qualcomm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Voltage Domain Support Message-ID: <20201027110725.GE20482@e120937-lin> References: <20201026203148.47416-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <202010271312.r4CIynpy-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202010271312.r4CIynpy-lkp@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 02:04:39PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Cristian, > > Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next] > [also build test WARNING on next-20201026] > [cannot apply to regulator/for-next robh/for-next rockchip/for-next keystone/next arm64/for-next/core linux/master linux-rpi/for-rpi-next at91/at91-next] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Cristian-Marussi/Add-support-for-SCMIv3-0-Voltage-Domain-Protocol-and-SCMI-Regulator/20201027-043404 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next > config: arm-randconfig-c004-20201026 (attached as .config) > compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > "coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)" > >> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/voltage.c:381:11-17: ERROR: application of sizeof to pointer > This is a false positive because the intention here was in fact to allocate an array of pointers with devm_kcalloc(). Maybe I could explicitly use a sizeof(void *) to avoid fooling coccicheck ? Thanks Cristian > Please review and possibly fold the followup patch. > > --- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org