From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAD7C5519F for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407632100A for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="MsSIo2ks" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728086AbgKLQmw (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:42:52 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:37190 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727739AbgKLQmv (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:42:51 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACGgjIe029624; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:42:45 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1605199365; bh=2DGsLmpm70ck0G0m7wcSLhSHPrIa0aoiLqRCKAIbVp0=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=MsSIo2ksmW7EIM3Jqlco/7L9jl/dRstSDGgT8w3b3ehBblu3EZMPQV9GkGEReFM2g w+JDu+lRgDh84ndOHOgcBpsDJkV9ovYWvSsxE/6zw2DjEuk/h90XTlHtvxBEUYwsoi Gbysehl0jydGiWcnIEhHgTiyBN1FvBOfy29PAnbo= Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (dfle105.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.26]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ACGgjTa014006 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:42:45 -0600 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:42:45 -0600 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:42:45 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACGgj3N052392; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:42:45 -0600 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 10:42:45 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Faiz Abbas CC: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add gpio support for TI's J7200 platform Message-ID: <20201112164245.d6rdmsl4aomplqku@kahuna> References: <20201102191120.20380-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201102191120.20380-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 00:41-20201103, Faiz Abbas wrote: > The following patches add gpio support for TI's J7200 platform. > > These patches were posted as a part of an older series but have now > been split into three parts. The 3 parts add configs, gpios and MMC/SD > related dts patches respectively. > > Older series is here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201001190541.6364-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com/ > > Series adding configs to arm64 defconfig is here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201102183005.14174-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com/ > > Faiz Abbas (3): > arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add gpio nodes in main domain > arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Add gpio nodes in wakeup domain I am not sure why we are splitting patches per domain here. We should just have a single patch that introduces the nodes, I dont see a specific benefit. In addition, series also introduces additional Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider Which we need a conclusion for and the comments already provided. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D