From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9B8C433E0 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D462311D for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725964AbgLVIkt (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:40:49 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com ([209.85.221.51]:45271 "EHLO mail-wr1-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725881AbgLVIkt (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:40:49 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id d26so13651078wrb.12; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:40:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mc9YlhklgHyo+ZWWiXFF+G5IvrUtXxS5OoPxIUrgAi8=; b=i/yaw8YvaLzDey8ctzS7W2RHMfHwGuZCmUq4wlz1cplDf9xfY4yQPf3ZecnpUiZHHn Gn/uIeIPJ/RbIHzOaID3Ylp6BPcTaP0msc/DzuaXTcmSYDPUSDLYiFHbMKkwLj8VVOmv k4tlBGdrVbhwPSNoaRfcB3KTRSJSsCVODYmnONHio6K1sKRwPY0mkMsjvbSp+oKZ6ey4 huwG9GCmqq4PWxLCcr+yU06cCWjcs6zD8itFNUpokmADcZHuMudG/ggoIUueq1VWGJQa XORFmcEcin4tad20kkcnWKIEXqLh2kxcsFPBRPLNTga5CHEb2VxPbD9mD4VbYOYxIb7K vEhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fOaEKUNkiOQ3ukmDz16LHzN/VHXLclw6zrpAT1z6viSO17xHU SoS7j5YlfOLLYx7P+vPsxW0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlDP78lehfTDWIpBPpCIU0VDik+63U+FbSYlT6DrBR8XdQpBIIFnmsnOXGe61CfTe9azDZOw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f401:: with SMTP id g1mr22765242wro.258.1608626406804; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:40:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from kozik-lap (adsl-84-226-167-205.adslplus.ch. [84.226.167.205]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm29700988wrm.28.2020.12.22.00.40.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:40:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:40:04 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Timon Baetz Cc: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Rob Herring , MyungJoo Ham , Chanwoo Choi , Lee Jones , Sebastian Reichel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] power: supply: max8997_charger: Set CHARGER current limit Message-ID: <20201222084004.GD5026@kozik-lap> References: <20201222070520.710096-1-timon.baetz@protonmail.com> <20201222070520.710096-4-timon.baetz@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201222070520.710096-4-timon.baetz@protonmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 07:31:40AM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote: > Register for extcon notification and set charging current depending on > the detected cable type. Current values are taken from vendor kernel, > where most charger types end up setting 650mA [0]. > > Also enable and disable the CHARGER regulator based on extcon events. > > [0] https://github.com/krzk/linux-vendor-backup/blob/samsung/galaxy-s2-epic-4g-touch-sph-d710-exynos4210-dump/drivers/misc/max8997-muic.c#L1675-L1678 > > Signed-off-by: Timon Baetz > --- > drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c b/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c > index 1947af25879a..673ffff14ae0 100644 > --- a/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max8997_charger.c > @@ -6,12 +6,14 @@ > // MyungJoo Ham > > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > /* MAX8997_REG_STATUS4 */ > #define DCINOK_SHIFT 1 > @@ -31,6 +33,10 @@ struct charger_data { > struct device *dev; > struct max8997_dev *iodev; > struct power_supply *battery; > + struct regulator *reg; > + struct extcon_dev *edev; > + struct notifier_block extcon_nb; > + struct work_struct extcon_work; > }; > > static enum power_supply_property max8997_battery_props[] = { > @@ -88,6 +94,67 @@ static int max8997_battery_get_property(struct power_supply *psy, > return 0; > } > > +static void max8997_battery_extcon_evt_stop_work(void *data) > +{ > + struct charger_data *charger = data; > + > + cancel_work_sync(&charger->extcon_work); > +} > + > +static void max8997_battery_extcon_evt_worker(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct charger_data *charger = > + container_of(work, struct charger_data, extcon_work); > + struct extcon_dev *edev = charger->edev; > + int current_limit; > + > + if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP) > 0) { > + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB SDP charger is connected\n"); > + current_limit = 450000; > + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_DCP) > 0) { > + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB DCP charger is connected\n"); > + current_limit = 650000; > + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_FAST) > 0) { > + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB FAST charger is connected\n"); > + current_limit = 650000; > + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_SLOW) > 0) { > + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB SLOW charger is connected\n"); > + current_limit = 650000; > + } else if (extcon_get_state(edev, EXTCON_CHG_USB_CDP) > 0) { > + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB CDP charger is connected\n"); > + current_limit = 650000; > + } else { > + dev_dbg(charger->dev, "USB charger is diconnected\n"); > + current_limit = -1; > + } > + > + if (current_limit > 0) { > + int ret = regulator_set_current_limit(charger->reg, current_limit, current_limit); > + > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to set current limit: %d\n", ret); > + return; > + } > + ret = regulator_enable(charger->reg); > + if (ret) > + dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to enable regulator: %d\n", ret); > + } else { > + int ret = regulator_disable(charger->reg); > + > + if (ret) > + dev_err(charger->dev, "failed to disable regulator: %d\n", ret); > + } > +} > + > +static int max8997_battery_extcon_evt(struct notifier_block *nb, > + unsigned long event, void *param) > +{ > + struct charger_data *charger = > + container_of(nb, struct charger_data, extcon_nb); > + schedule_work(&charger->extcon_work); > + return NOTIFY_OK; > +} > + > static const struct power_supply_desc max8997_battery_desc = { > .name = "max8997_pmic", > .type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY, > @@ -170,6 +237,33 @@ static int max8997_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(charger->battery); > } > > + charger->reg = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "charger"); The code looks good but isn't it breaking all existing platforms? Best regards, Krzysztof > + if (IS_ERR(charger->reg)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get charger regulator\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(charger->reg); > + } > +