From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E46C433E0 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 15:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA46322B45 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 15:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725838AbhAEPOG (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:14:06 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:39602 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725936AbhAEPOF (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:14:05 -0500 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 105FCMQn012022; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:12:22 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1609859542; bh=mEd6uiP7ZJTbYDLPwiYXQLyxW/qQsfNO7uWM61UIuqk=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=sMgDQUGtTm9DGwd1dqUY74OxvPLszViG8lp2ax++b9ZvV9XvfcNSkPn0TO42dmmkW VpUxpsz6+/l1i9tgPHekLAuIVJVDS0HNN6HGM7+jfS+DvyFMzFIONSr/28qxDnPUBu ta87y5W6lA7XYGcmlnHuic8YNlhA13t43y0x5Uyw= Received: from DLEE115.ent.ti.com (dlee115.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.26]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 105FCMf4037322 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:12:22 -0600 Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) by DLEE115.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:12:22 -0600 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:12:22 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 105FCL8R002667; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:12:21 -0600 Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:12:20 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Dave Gerlach CC: Suman Anna , Rob Herring , , , Tony Lindgren , Vignesh Raghavendra , Sekhar Nori , Kishon Vijay Abraham , Lokesh Vutla , Aswath Govindraju Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: Add Support for AM642 SoC Message-ID: <20210105151220.vy42nw7uwv5ax3z6@library> References: <20201125052004.17823-1-d-gerlach@ti.com> <20201125052004.17823-3-d-gerlach@ti.com> <9ef76d15-46e5-884d-2b00-3228c46a73ac@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 22:02-20210104, Dave Gerlach wrote: > >> This is atleast missing the ranges for On-Chip SRAM and the R5FSS, but those can > >> always be added incrementally as well. > > Yes, I think they should be added incrementally once a user is present. > Most of the driver dependencies are resolved in v5.11-rc1. So, you should be able to add a lot of devices (aka users) instead of making this a barebones dts as the first introduction - I see no benefit of things coming in piece meal - other than creating all kind of dependency mayhem that I don't want to deal with. Please make sure that all nodes for all peripherals that can be introduced in v5.11-rc1 is part of this introduction of device. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D