From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB85C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B19123A9C for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 18:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728713AbhAVSIK (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:08:10 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:43214 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729044AbhAVSHc (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:07:32 -0500 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10MI6TcB073608; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:06:29 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1611338789; bh=g/EkiDDiGPN4jY+LKUX8Qw0vz+LhVSiznrkxbxhpiAw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Q6aMIngJlMQola3IJizaNUW9xyGfgeBDFe8PCYFls7rYwGQSS4Y/tE6hi+x8UeR1K ax1wa9fyLB8eS8/A7tI6oodRObGC/hyxPCvnozx5No4eDMar+ssPC4nTDLfKkhGghK PEmH+3Sye3fGFF3CMpM+XhAuhtbQBVMjX2bv4h/U= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10MI6TBR027191 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:06:29 -0600 Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:06:28 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:06:29 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10MI6Tcb032236; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:06:29 -0600 Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:06:29 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Aswath Govindraju CC: Lokesh Vutla , Vignesh Raghavendra , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: J7200: Add support for higher speed modes in MMCSD subsystems Message-ID: <20210122180629.3j3aoueiwiib4gso@cavalier> References: <20210122162403.20700-1-a-govindraju@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210122162403.20700-1-a-govindraju@ti.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 21:54-20210122, Aswath Govindraju wrote: > The following series of patches > - adds support for HS200 and HS400 speed modes in MMCSD0 subsystem > - adds support for UHS-I speed modes in MMCSD1 subsystem > > Aswath Govindraju (2): > arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add support for HS200 and HS400 modes > in MMCSD0 subsystem > arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-main: Add support for UHS-I modes in MMCSD1 > subsystem Just a curious couple of questions: Does squashing both the patches create a problem for understanding or a later bisect? I kind of thought these mostly go hand in hand between the instances, am I mistaken? Are there any otap delay params update needed or the defaults are good to go? Will also help to provide some verification log along with this. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D