From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: xxm <xxm@rock-chips.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 17:25:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210126152539.GI1053290@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJET8-gn-uy11EVHJAz057FVH3-BErwyL41W2WpxhgQUQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:52:31AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:01 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:40:10PM +0800, xxm wrote:
> > > Hi Leon,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply.
> > >
> > > 在 2021/1/25 13:48, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:49:27AM +0800, Simon Xue wrote:
> > > > > pcie-dw-rockchip is based on DWC IP. But pcie-rockchip-host
> > > > > is Rockchip designed IP which is only used for RK3399. So all the following
> > > > > non-RK3399 SoCs should use this driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 9 +
> > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 286 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 3 files changed, 296 insertions(+)
> > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > > > > index 22c5529e9a65..aee408fe9283 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -214,6 +214,15 @@ config PCIE_ARTPEC6_EP
> > > > > Enables support for the PCIe controller in the ARTPEC-6 SoC to work in
> > > > > endpoint mode. This uses the DesignWare core.
> > > > >
> > > > > +config PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST
> > > > > + bool "Rockchip DesignWare PCIe controller"
> > > > > + select PCIE_DW
> > > > > + select PCIE_DW_HOST
> > > > > + depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
> > > > > + depends on OF
> > > > > + help
> > > > > + Enables support for the DW PCIe controller in the Rockchip SoC.
> > > > > +
> > > > > config PCIE_INTEL_GW
> > > > > bool "Intel Gateway PCIe host controller support"
> > > > > depends on OF && (X86 || COMPILE_TEST)
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > > > > index a751553fa0db..30eef8e9ee8a 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> > > > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE_EP) += pci-layerscape-ep.o
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_QCOM) += pcie-qcom.o
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARMADA_8K) += pcie-armada8k.o
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARTPEC6) += pcie-artpec6.o
> > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST) += pcie-dw-rockchip.o
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 000000000000..07f6d1cd5853
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
> > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * PCIe host controller driver for Rockchip SoCs
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > > > > + * http://www.rock-chips.com
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Author: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * The upper 16 bits of PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG are a write
> > > > > + * mask for the lower 16 bits. This allows atomic updates
> > > > > + * of the register without locking.
> > > > > + */
> > > > This is correct only for the variables that naturally aligned, I imagine
> > > > that this is the case here and in the Linux, but better do not write comments
> > > > in the code that are not accurate.
> > >
> > > Ok, will remove.
> > > I wonder what it would be when outside the Linux? Could you share some information?
> >
> > The C standard says nothing about atomicity, integer assignment maybe atomic,
> > maybe it isn’t. There is no guarantee, plain integer assignment in C is non-atomic
> > by definition.
> >
> > The atomicity of u32 is very dependent on hardware vendor, memory model and compiler,
> > for example x86 and ARMs guarantee atomicity for u32. This is why I said that probably
> > here (Linux) it is ok and you are not alone in expecting lockless write.
>
> But this is a mmio register accessed thru writel() which does have all
> those guarantees.
The author didn't write "The writel() guarantees atomic updates
without need of locking".
Anyway, this is not important.
Thanks
>
> Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 2:48 [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Simon Xue
2021-01-25 2:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
2021-01-25 5:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-25 6:40 ` xxm
2021-01-25 9:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-25 15:53 ` Robin Murphy
2021-01-25 18:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-01-26 2:34 ` xxm
2021-01-26 14:52 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-26 15:25 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2021-01-25 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add " Rob Herring
2021-01-25 15:26 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-26 2:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由robherring2@gmail.com代发】 xxm
2021-01-26 14:48 ` Rob Herring
2021-01-25 15:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Johan Jonker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210126152539.GI1053290@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=xxm@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox