Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller

[Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>]

On 06:49-20210122, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:33:05 +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings
> > like below for all interrupt controllers.
> > 
> > /bus@100000/bus@30000000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider
> > 
> > Fix these by adding #address-cells = <0>; for all interrupt controllers in
> > TI device-tree files. Any other #address-cells value is really only needed
> > if interrupt-map property is being used (which is not the case for existing
> > TI device-tree files)
> 
> Hi Lokesh Vutla,
> 
> I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-next on [1].
> Thank you!
> 
> [1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller
>       commit: 73d0af633c4bed02f8e71658c9e25ac8250b08c4
> 
> 
> All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
> tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
> the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
> problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
[...]

Lokesh,

Based on discussion on [1] - looks like #address-cells = 0 usage
is still to be resolved and needs some alignment between Andre and
Rob on where to take this (dtc fixups to handle this Vs explicit
#address-cells = 0 and increase in dtb size).

I propose we drop this patch rather than having to revert this at a
later point after I send a PR. Anyone has any objections?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210126163839.57491132@slackpad.fritz.box/

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D