From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47885C433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CE064EC3 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229987AbhBVJEl (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:04:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45418 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230053AbhBVJDm (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 04:03:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F95C061786 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:02:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id u14so18208223wri.3 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:02:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=jhgPHu6XXx4pz5/SSjHGKFmkDKfHLvhV3padIpoDdfM=; b=qxNPJcFvg4PQYwmX+2pVg3h8wMc6/86JQPaKUL4oVcekZH3GwbXNwxgLVgm7V/bBdv JYgi+e2YYKOObufhKEEV2xMxDd+opnLLegrC8kBw49XIQRXgwHWPDKjf7O9pj/OEjXE5 FllPGCqQKkdJgU2yO3ePX9AKLSnm3SrywEwWtESO+1JSga3CkO9UrmOScpXaMZE8n5wc iSZLYR1rv/pAVz/BktMfMPKfOSTqdjT6KwL0DBQDSlCw7MAUENHOROL9Lq9Cv11lwaNF br8PNFQcBEadCzkkzj59HmRUUEypnaX1wyUMpKD/NFPY76Ra6Dfga8xhlPXTJEKIPcLg biDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=jhgPHu6XXx4pz5/SSjHGKFmkDKfHLvhV3padIpoDdfM=; b=k2QiiyIExjXMV1mDjyadPhHJdgXMTpwWVReX1s0SSE6UphH3ptlTKmxzaCMDIXGrUf +dFnU4l6Zi6VDFp+Q46IuI2vmTEvyvsiGqTNP/tVUG8TUJamxVnoFZLtiqWgKarEsirJ /vFby5zC6kTQqTuu6sp9cn/R9BEv1FEaI0i0vDNALRKlwZR1FEm3d1qKPJtzMuNN6KEa jm/a5gaWG5aiM6J4c5nMHR3Nt+Tl+Zex+h7V8T7dZgwoofRBd054UEDfdvSbjF5UNPMB 1yKl2cvWkZTKW3Q5ZI6zLw9Bevw/bxiekZMTv0JcP4ljLvUnNsDC/FvhUPGGKl7xmcuV UPuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NEsidsw9j/K2vZ+GeYZgEsZxaP1C3520vGW7s9hRq+Q/jqyet o8BlS+cxbGhonKpRtEQW4pJ3BA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxcHVtrDO2B9l9pMLHeQey3LKL4O91gSbrRAVPpGKjkSlIN1ls8XZxVOfmnx7rSZmrajszbRA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1819:: with SMTP id m25mr20698392wrh.342.1613984569427; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:02:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j14sm16040896wrw.34.2021.02.22.01.02.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:02:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:02:47 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Cristian Ciocaltea Cc: Mark Brown , Rob Herring , Dmitry Torokhov , Sebastian Reichel , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Liam Girdwood , Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= , Linus Walleij , linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add initial support for ATC260x PMICs Message-ID: <20210222090247.GA376568@dell> References: <20210221163602.GA297639@BV030612LT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210221163602.GA297639@BV030612LT> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Feb 2021, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > Hi Lee, > > I have just noticed your mfd-next tag for 5.12 doesn't include the > support for the ATC260x PMICs. > > I assumed the patchset is ready for merging.. Did I miss something? The MFD driver needs another review. For some reason, this didn't register on my TODO list. In general, if you don't receive a review within ~2 weeks of posting (and the merge window is not open), you should consider it lost and submit a [RESEND]. > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote: > > The ATC260x family of PMICs integrates Audio Codec, Power management, > > Clock generation and GPIO controller blocks. There are currently 3 > > variants: ATC2603A, ATC2603C and ATC2609A. > > > > This is re-spin of the v1 patch series submitted some time ago by > > Mani, who provided the MFD and regulator drivers for ATC2609A: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190617155011.15376-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org/ > > > > Since v2, I added support for ATC2603C, together with some new > > functionalities for both chips: power controller and onkey input. > > The ATC2603A chip type remains unsupported for the moment. > > > > This has been tested on RoseapplePi, a SBC based on the Actions Semi S500 > > SoC, which integrates the ATC2603C variant of the PMIC. > > > > Note that enabling the ATC260x PMICs on compatible Actions Semi Owl SoC > > based boards depends on: > > > > * the Actions Semi SIRQ driver (for PMIC DTS setup), merged in v5.10: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1600114378.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com/ > > > > * the atomic transfers in Owl I2C driver (for power controller), merged in v5.11: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1602190168.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com/ -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog